Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-03-2007, 06:38 PM
AMT AMT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching my baby grinders take your lunch money
Posts: 9,771
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

unfortunately this is a fold. im a station so id prob. call in game knowing hes on ATC
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2007, 06:38 PM
ymu ymu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,606
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
It's a clear call if you've never worked with ICM tools lol.

[/ QUOTE ]
That was a response to Shillx? LOL.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-03-2007, 06:45 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,661
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:19 PM
PattdownManiac PattdownManiac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Punking Fools at Wendys?
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:36 PM
ymu ymu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,606
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed!

[/ QUOTE ]
This is one of those hands where the future matters - ICM doesn't incorporate that. It's not clear either way, but it's definitely not a clear fold.

To answer this definitively you'd need to do a simulation - run the bubble a few thousand times with the big stack pushing every hand and doing his best to keep shortie alive with everyone else acting as ICM suggests.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:38 PM
Little John Little John is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,843
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed!

[/ QUOTE ]
This is one of those hands where the future matters - ICM doesn't incorporate that. It's not clear either way, but it's definitely not a clear fold.

To answer this definitively you'd need to do a simulation - run the bubble a few thousand times with the big stack pushing every hand and doing his best to keep shortie alive with everyone else acting as ICM suggests.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point. I think if you do this simulation calling would be better.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:40 PM
AMT AMT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching my baby grinders take your lunch money
Posts: 9,771
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

TFG implies in the original post that he understands that ICM would say this is slightly -EV...clearly if thats all he wanted to know, he wouldn't bother posting this.

that said, the stacks are pretty perfect for making this call, given bubble implications.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:41 PM
ymu ymu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,606
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed!

[/ QUOTE ]
This is one of those hands where the future matters - ICM doesn't incorporate that. It's not clear either way, but it's definitely not a clear fold.

To answer this definitively you'd need to do a simulation - run the bubble a few thousand times with the big stack pushing every hand and doing his best to keep shortie alive with everyone else acting as ICM suggests.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point. I think if you do this simulation calling would be better.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's my instinct - it's definitely a better call than ICM would suggest, and there are three factors which contribute to that so the difference is probably quite substantial.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:43 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

lol patdown ill give you 2:1 on your bankroll that shillx would score higher than you an a bubble quiz. Let me know!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:46 PM
ymu ymu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,606
Default Re: 27T: Go beyond ICM to make this bubble call?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lol whatever. Folding must be correct b/c SNGPT says so!

[/ QUOTE ]

lol patdown ill give you 2:1 on your bankroll that shillx would score higher than you an a bubble quiz. Let me know!

[/ QUOTE ]
I'll take some of that action. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.