|
|
#21
10-18-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: wong galores this week
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] By the way, everyone beware of the KC/Oak fake wong. From what I can see, the fairish line on this game is 3 and some sites are still offering it at 2.5. [/ QUOTE ] Pinny has it at <2.5 [/ QUOTE ] Pinny also shades their lines now to prevent teasers, just look at the juice. [/ QUOTE ] Schwatt, What's the true line? 
|
|
#22
10-18-2007, 07:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: wong galores this week
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] By the way, everyone beware of the KC/Oak fake wong. From what I can see, the fairish line on this game is 3 and some sites are still offering it at 2.5. [/ QUOTE ] Pinny has it at <2.5 [/ QUOTE ] Pinny also shades their lines now to prevent teasers, just look at the juice. [/ QUOTE ] Schwatt, What's the true line? [/ QUOTE ] It's +2.5 @ -101 at MB, so I'm guessing that's pretty close.
|
|
#23
10-18-2007, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: wong galores this week
[ QUOTE ]
I've got Skins -2.5, Titans +7.5 and Bucs +8 [/ QUOTE ] Does my Wong teaser look okay? Anyone not like it? It was -110 on WSEX.
|
|
#26
10-18-2007, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: wong galores this week
Since everything in this thread is pretty much trash, on a random note, were the Jets +7 at some books against the Bungals today or yesterday?? I am losing my mind and I thought I saw +7 on a few sites.
-Brendan
|
|
#27
10-18-2007, 09:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: wong galores this week
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] why is everyone doing these now instead of waiting? [/ QUOTE ] Because some of these lines are at -8.5 now and may move to -9 soon? [/ QUOTE ] The correct answer is: They don't read the Wong FAQ.
|
|
#29
10-18-2007, 09:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: wong galores this week
It was hanging on 5Dimes is where I saw it. Yeah they have it -125 now +7 on them Jets.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
