Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:37 AM
fraac fraac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 752
Default relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

With 72o at the bottom. Pokertracker stats of a great player should converge to the answer I seek. For recent most popular game conditions: no-limit, online, small-medium stakes, probably 6max. Available?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:39 AM
KLJ KLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ucla
Posts: 2,890
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

AA
KK
QQ
...
72o

This what you're looking for?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:44 AM
steel108 steel108 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ^^^^ I\'m going to hell
Posts: 2,807
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

Your playable hand ranges can't be static. There are so many factors that dictate what you should be playing including table dynamics, tendancy of players at the table, position, your specific image, etc.... There are some tables where I run 32/25 and others where I run 15/12. I don't think you will get the answer you seek; at least nothing that will be of value to you.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2007, 04:46 AM
fraac fraac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 752
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

With enough hands played, it should be what I want.

KLJ: yeah, but with EVs attached.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2007, 07:33 AM
jii jii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Making love to Scandinavian blondes
Posts: 740
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

[ QUOTE ]
...I don't think you will get the answer you seek; at least nothing that will be of value to you.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2007, 07:36 AM
hra146 hra146 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam, bitches
Posts: 4,041
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

Is this philosophy ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2007, 09:27 AM
punter11235 punter11235 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Check out my blog
Posts: 3,239
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

[ QUOTE ]
Your playable hand ranges can't be static. There are so many factors that dictate what you should be playing including table dynamics, tendancy of players at the table, position, your specific image, etc....

[/ QUOTE ]

Fascinating.
I always play the same when first to enter at every of my 10 tables. I just follow the default for the day (which vary depending on my mood as I would die from boredom always playing the same but thats about only factor I consider).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2007, 09:29 AM
fraac fraac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 752
Default Re: relative playability of starting hands, a list of, have you?

I have all the other variables factored in (or out) already. The game type, in some broad sense I suspect is meaningful when viewed in comparison, can be characterised by the relative playabilities of starting hands. Who said 72o was worst anyway? Maybe the modern game doesn't play that way.

None of which is what presently interests me, but there it is.

Handily, if a good player has played a large number of hands, this information is very easy to obtain. Can anyone help?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.