|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What to do? | |||
| Take a picture, Write a letter see if company offers me $$ |
   
|
33 | 75.00% |
| Do nothing. Worms are protein. |
  
|
3 | 6.82% |
| Standard. |
  
|
8 | 18.18% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-06-2007, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Atheism Intelligence Correlations - The Strongest Argument for Atheism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think the strongest single argument for atheism (yes I know the burden of proof is on the theists, that's not relevant) is the fact that there is a high correlation between atheism and intelligence. [/ QUOTE ] This is essentially a selfish position. You likely seek validation for personal reasons. I see the strongest arguments for and against atheism as those that bear on the future success of the species and its overall happiness along the way. I await the historical record of the stunningly successful atheist society, something on a par with that of western Christianity. None exists unless you engage in academic gyrations of gymnastic proportion (and this board has many such athletes). In situations where religion is supressed, overall societal happiness falls like a rock. So if you wish to prove the value of atheism for society, meer theory regarding the future won't get it done. Study history like it matters and you may come to realize that humanity fares best with religion in general and has done very well indeed under Christianity. Sadly, none of this is any longer common wisdom. [/ QUOTE ] If I understand correctly you are being very pragmatic; considering truth to be irrelevant in deciding whether atheism is 'correct'. I have never heard of a hypothesis accepted or rejected based on how well we expect to like its effects. 
|
|
#2
11-06-2007, 10:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Atheism Intelligence Correlations - The Strongest Argument for Atheism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think the strongest single argument for atheism (yes I know the burden of proof is on the theists, that's not relevant) is the fact that there is a high correlation between atheism and intelligence. [/ QUOTE ] This is essentially a selfish position. You likely seek validation for personal reasons. I see the strongest arguments for and against atheism as those that bear on the future success of the species and its overall happiness along the way. I await the historical record of the stunningly successful atheist society, something on a par with that of western Christianity. None exists unless you engage in academic gyrations of gymnastic proportion (and this board has many such athletes). In situations where religion is supressed, overall societal happiness falls like a rock. So if you wish to prove the value of atheism for society, meer theory regarding the future won't get it done. Study history like it matters and you may come to realize that humanity fares best with religion in general and has done very well indeed under Christianity. Sadly, none of this is any longer common wisdom. [/ QUOTE ] If I understand correctly you are being very pragmatic; considering truth to be irrelevant in deciding whether atheism is 'correct'. I have never heard of a hypothesis accepted or rejected based on how well we expect to like its effects. [/ QUOTE ] What end is served by proving atheism 'correct'? Leave aside the fact the proof will not come. What do we, society, gain?
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
