|
|
|
|
#2
10-28-2007, 05:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
btw, i dont think this call is standard or anything, but certainly not out of the question.
When he check calls flop and turn, zupp is prob following thru w/ air on the riv, and i think timex prob thought that w/ ace high zupp would check behind slightly more often on the turn. Not sayin this is true but its prob wat timex was thinkin. 
|
|
#4
10-28-2007, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
this rly isnt a very interesting hand
Timex probably should have folded preflop , especially with the structure of this tournament. As played he hit a boat and c/c down. His river call was probably -ev vs most players but if he was convinced his opponent was shoving his entire range and playing a standard range on the button then it was +ev for sure, although this is a big assumption find a better hand mabe?
|
|
#5
10-28-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
this rly isnt a very interesting hand Timex probably should have folded preflop , especially with the structure of this tournament. As played he hit a boat and c/c down. His river call was probably -ev vs most players but if he was convinced his opponent was shoving his entire range and playing a standard range on the button then it was +ev for sure, although this is a big assumption find a better hand mabe? [/ QUOTE ] I disagree with you. Im doing a follow up on an almost identicall hand except that the results are the reversed. i think there are many levels of thinking in both hands... As for folding pre-flop i think u have misunderstood the structure completly.
|
|
#6
10-28-2007, 09:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree with you. Im doing a follow up on an almost identicall hand except that the results are the reversed. i think there are many levels of thinking in both hands... [/ QUOTE ] well, you're wrong. I'm sure timex himself can come post here and tell you no one is folding 77 on that board w/that action on the flop or turn, and that he decided to call the river because he thought the guy was bluffing more than 1/3 the time. That's it. Poker is rarely that complicated guy, you picked a bad hand.
|
|
#7
10-28-2007, 10:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I disagree with you. Im doing a follow up on an almost identicall hand except that the results are the reversed. i think there are many levels of thinking in both hands... [/ QUOTE ] well, you're wrong. I'm sure timex himself can come post here and tell you no one is folding 77 on that board w/that action on the flop or turn, and that he decided to call the river because he thought the guy was bluffing more than 1/3 the time. That's it. Poker is rarely that complicated guy, you picked a bad hand. [/ QUOTE ] hu grudgematch time!
|
|
#8
10-28-2007, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
Poker is rarely that complicated guy, you picked a bad hand. [/ QUOTE ] \ wait, is his name guy or do you actually say that to people?
|
|
#9
10-28-2007, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I disagree with you. Im doing a follow up on an almost identicall hand except that the results are the reversed. i think there are many levels of thinking in both hands... [/ QUOTE ] well, you're wrong. I'm sure timex himself can come post here and tell you no one is folding 77 on that board w/that action on the flop or turn, and that he decided to call the river because he thought the guy was bluffing more than 1/3 the time. That's it. Poker is rarely that complicated guy, you picked a bad hand. [/ QUOTE ] Its not that simple. I cant answer for timex but i believe he has went to the same thought process as i have. if that ace doesnt fall on the river I dont pay off. I fold. In fact its probably the only river im paying off. The ace on the river is the best possible card for both players. ITS THE RIVER THAT MAKES THIS HAND INTERESTING! I dont think u have given this hand a fair chance. Have u actually tried to think a little deeper? I know you are a very good thinking player so your response and attitude suprise me. As for a grudge match im up for it with any stakes and my word can be trusted.
|
|
#10
10-29-2007, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Very interesting 100-200 hand. Need all the help i can get!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I disagree with you. Im doing a follow up on an almost identicall hand except that the results are the reversed. i think there are many levels of thinking in both hands... [/ QUOTE ] well, you're wrong. I'm sure timex himself can come post here and tell you no one is folding 77 on that board w/that action on the flop or turn, and that he decided to call the river because he thought the guy was bluffing more than 1/3 the time. That's it. Poker is rarely that complicated guy, you picked a bad hand. [/ QUOTE ] i agree and dont post a tournament hand at 100/200 blinds and pretend its 100/200 no limit, there 2 completely different things, and this is the wrong forum for it
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
