Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-20-2007, 12:08 AM
Kasane Kasane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 906
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
I want to address some different issues.

First off: "Ask yourself if you're not c-betting 22 here"
If you can't see the difference between 22 and KK, there's nothing anyone can do to help you. (Even besides the obvious)
When you cbet with 22, you really expect a lot of better hands to fold. When you cbet with KK, no better hands fold. That's why cbetting with 22 is a much better situation than cbetting with KK here.

Next, for those advocating cbetting because "checking lets him take the pot from us." What do you do if he calls your cbet? Do you give up?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you saying you'd cbet 22 and chk/fold the KK??? I hope not. That's my reason for saying 22 is more or less equivalent with KK here in this spot.

That's why I said KK might... might be worthy of a c/c line on the flop. That's the only other alternative. It's just not as good, though potentially feasible against some opponents, as just betting out. It's not as much of a cbet as 22, because we've got more equity -- if you want to think of it in those terms. It's not as if we whiffed, if that's what we're terming a cbet, it's just that a scary card, the only really scary card, came on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 07-20-2007, 12:11 AM
Lurker. Lurker. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: May your pain be champagne
Posts: 5,622
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]

When you cbet with KK, no better hands fold.



[/ QUOTE ]

sure, but a lot of worse hands call.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 07-20-2007, 12:37 AM
DaycareInferno DaycareInferno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: wot u say
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

i don't understand why people get so hung up on only getting called by better hands. the bottom line is, if you can make a bet that shows a profit, that bet is better than dumping your hand, period. the only time you should really worry about scenarios where you allow your opponent to play perfectly is when you are debating between a line which involves raising and a line that involves calling.

lets say you are playing against in this exact hand against an opponent who has a vp$ of 100 and the magical ability to make perfect decisions at every opportunity. he folds to bets when he is behind and he raises when he is ahead. do you dump your hand on the flop because you'll only get called by a better hand? no, of course not, because there are so many worse hands that you're still making something out of betting, and something is better than nothing.

it is also not true that no pfr is going to check out with top pair. i do it quite often when i have top pair with a marginal kicker. i do it quite often, because i'm going to call as opposed to dumping my hand. in that situation, those concepts actually apply, because i'm passing up a + for a bigger +, as opposed to passing up a + for a 0. i think most strong players have the ability to play marginal hands in the dark from time to time as opposed to dumping them or playing them like blanks.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-20-2007, 03:22 AM
Lurker. Lurker. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: May your pain be champagne
Posts: 5,622
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

this thread is a trainwreck and would confuse anyone who has trouble playing in these spots. if you have trouble in these spots, DO NOT READ THIS THREAD
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 07-20-2007, 03:41 AM
Gustav Gustav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 250
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can't imagine cbetting here, I think it's terrible. I check every street.

My basic pattern here is check flop, then;
Fold to a full pot bet or ~90%+.
Call a reasonable bet.

Fold turn if he bets significantly more than he bet on the flop.
Call if he bets the same as on the flop or slightly more.

Same on river, but expect to lose when I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? That's pretty gross

[/ QUOTE ]

Which part?
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 07-20-2007, 04:02 AM
hanover hanover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: pura vida
Posts: 142
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can't imagine cbetting here, I think it's terrible. I check every street.

My basic pattern here is check flop, then;
Fold to a full pot bet or ~90%+.
Call a reasonable bet.

Fold turn if he bets significantly more than he bet on the flop.
Call if he bets the same as on the flop or slightly more.

Same on river, but expect to lose when I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? That's pretty gross

[/ QUOTE ]

Which part?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm ... all of it?
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 07-20-2007, 04:06 AM
Kasane Kasane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 906
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
This is identical to the hand I posted last last night/this morning.

I 3bet KK OOP and Axx flop. Betting the flop is pretty bad here, as long as you're mixing up your play and ck'ing AK and AA on occasion. I don't see how betting here is right...all we are doing is turning our hand into a bluff, plain and simple.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post11276829

[/ QUOTE ]

SFC, the range is quite a bit tighter in a 3bet hand. Not saying checking the flop is right there or not in that one.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 07-20-2007, 04:09 AM
TheRenaissance TheRenaissance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,209
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Check/folding here is the worst way you could possibly play this - what horrible advice.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 07-20-2007, 04:35 AM
maccamack maccamack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 541
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

C/R Flop
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 07-20-2007, 08:46 AM
RatFink RatFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not close enough to Ljubljana
Posts: 468
Default Re: 100NL, KK and confused about c-betting

[ QUOTE ]
C/R Flop

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, and CheckRaise all in to really put him to the test...

.. and then bust out 3rd in the Main Event for no reason at all.

Hardly a great play.

Check-raising doesn't do anything for you but put chips in the middle that you can't control on the turn.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.