|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EBITDA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Buffett and Munger don't use it. Munger went as far as saying "anytime you see the words 'EBITDA earnings,' you should substitue '[censored] earnings.'" Lately, I have been reading Eddie Lampert's letter to shareholders and it's almost as if I was reading Buffett's letters [but with less humor]. One thing that stood out was Lampert's excessive use of EBITDA. Lampert is currently managing a retail company. Does this means EBITDA is significant in evaluating retail businesses? [/ QUOTE ] Not necessarily. EBITDA provides one of several possible views of company earnings growth. Obviously if a guy is crowing about EBITDA he thinks it provides valuable insight. You'll have to evaluate the I,T,D, and A parts yourself to see if you agree with him. [/ QUOTE ] Do you know the differences in investing philosophies between Buffett and Lampert [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EBITDA
For the companies I analyze EBITDA is one of the most important things to look at.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EBITDA
[ QUOTE ]
For the companies I analyze EBITDA is one of the most important things to look at. [/ QUOTE ] Can you give examples of the industries they are in? Or did you mean any company? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: EBITDA
companies with a lot of assets whose book value of depreciation is nowhere near close to an accurate gauge of what the assets realistically deteriorate at.
|
|
|