#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Being a nit postflop, AQs 50nl
If we call preflop we have to call the flop.
This hand would be much more interesting if we had some turn and river action IMHO. maybe he potted it to get you to fold and was cbetting KK-, or representing AK and wanted you to fold? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Being a nit postflop, AQs 50nl
[ QUOTE ]
I like a nice ole 3 bet PF. On to the hand, I think taking one off here is good. Call here, dont raise. See what he does. [/ QUOTE ] Agree. Without a read, we're good here often enough to call, and we're going to get a ton of information about villain's hand when we see his turn action. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Being a nit postflop, AQs 50nl
I have a hard time to accept that we could have good enough read here that our fold would be justified. If we would know that villain is only raising from UTG with AA, KK, QQ, JJ, AK and AQ, then it’s easy fold preflop, but we don’t have that luxury and call preflop against random opponent here is OK. Also cbet on the flop is something that preflop raiser is likely to do regardless how strong he actually is. Neither the size of the bet tells us if we are behind or not. I would say that bigger the bet, more likely we are ahead. Normally players tend to bet bigger when they want their opponents to fold and smaller when they want them to call. Actually they should do just the opposite or bet always the same amount (% of the pot).
|
|
|