#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
I have a decent timex read and I'm not folding tens/probably not nines/AQ [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
[ QUOTE ]
I have a decent timex read and I'm not folding tens/probably not nines/AQ [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] (if by 'timex read' you mean he plays bad) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have a decent timex read and I'm not folding tens/probably not nines/AQ [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] (if by 'timex read' you mean he plays bad) [/ QUOTE ] Bragging about this read would be like bragging about my read on fgators |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
nah I think timex plays well. I also think he adjusts for perceived range vs. 2+2'ers.
I also think I'm playing a bit of a message board metagame here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
[ QUOTE ]
nah I think timex plays well. I also think he adjusts for perceived range vs. 2+2'ers. [/ QUOTE ] This also ran through my mind while I was tanking with 99. I think it's pretty close, but I folded this time. I'll call next time to keep him honest... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
UB is a lot tighter then any other site due to 10 handed ness and the way people play there etc. Timex is not squeezing wide here he doesn't expect grafyx to be raise/folding much here esp with such large antees on UB. He knows 1 of the 2 is calling him here 98% of the time so don't be soo wide in calling. I say JJ+ AQs and AKo.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
[ QUOTE ]
UB is a lot tighter then any other site due to 10 handed ness and the way people play there etc. Timex is not squeezing wide here he doesn't expect grafyx to be raise/folding much here esp with such large antees on UB. He knows 1 of the 2 is calling him here 98% of the time so don't be soo wide in calling. I say JJ+ AQs and AKo. [/ QUOTE ] I expected to prob. get called like 70% of the time. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
shaun, your post doesn't make sense. UB being tight and having big antes =/= grafyx rarely raise/folding from ep...
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
[ QUOTE ]
shaun, your post doesn't make sense. UB being tight and having big antes =/= grafyx rarely raise/folding from ep... [/ QUOTE ] It does if grafyx isn't smart enough to exploit the tightness. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ub 500 FT hand vs timex
nah steve I mean with his stack raise/folding is really bad and with their tightness theres a lot better LP spots that will come up. And with the cold caller timex knows he's getting called about majority of the time so he needs to showup with a hand.
|
|
|