|
|
#31
03-13-2007, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
[ QUOTE ]
wtf, this getting as bad as hsnl with the advice. moss and dan, please think before posting. [/ QUOTE ] sorry for the bad advice yad. next time I promise I will not think like a robot. 
|
|
#34
03-13-2007, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
if you don't really have an established image and no history w/ this guy i don't really like this line (mostly pf call, lesser extent a river call, flop call being marginal). if you know for a fact AJ and AQ is in his 3betting range and he's an active player i still think pf is kinda bad, but flop would be good, and a river call would still probably be pretty close but sway to a call.
|
|
#36
03-13-2007, 02:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
This thread is hilarious ...
Yad, pf call is not good. LOL at you being "ahead" of his range with 55 when he reraises your UTG raise. Unless he is retarded, this isn't true. And stop acting so [censored] condescending. If he is good, he'll be value betting JJ+ on the river easily. If stacks were a little deeper, c/r ai would be sick.
|
|
#37
03-13-2007, 03:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
[ QUOTE ]
I find the responses here really interesting. I often play pretty robotically and don't tangle like this -- just fold whenver I miss. but i feel like when i AM playing well, i am often mixing it up in all sorts of marginal spots like this (but calling the river). [/ QUOTE ] I think you are remembering those marginal spots when you called and picked off a bluff, but forgot that you actually had a reason or a read for doing so. I'm 16/11 and I make plays like that all the time, but there is always a purpose behind it even when I'm wrong. Thinking you are ahead of his range on the flop and river here just looks like FPS and spew.
|
|
#38
03-13-2007, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
lol @ this thread
if you have been away for a while and are unsure of yourself why are you being so condescending to a chorus of intelligent replies put yourself in his shoes, it looks exactly like you have a medium strength hand that wants to showdown, and he bet anyway... villains line is v standard for an overpair on that board
|
|
#39
03-13-2007, 05:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
I like the preflop call. You raised UTG in a 6-handed game and he 3-bet from MP. That indicates a huge amount of strength. I think his range is comprised of QQ-AA/AK. 55 plays very well postflop against this tight range because we can play for set value and stack the majority of his range.
It may seem contradictory, but I would fold this preflop if villian had a loose 3-betting range. The tighter the range of the 3-better the bigger the raise I can handle.
|
|
#40
03-13-2007, 05:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I used to snap call here. Didn\'t I?
[ QUOTE ]
I like the preflop call. You raised UTG in a 6-handed game and he 3-bet from MP. That indicates a huge amount of strength. I think his range is comprised of QQ-AA/AK. 55 plays very well postflop against this tight range because we can play for set value and stack the majority of his range. It may seem contradictory, but I would fold this preflop if villian had a loose 3-betting range. The tighter the range of the 3-better the bigger the raise I can handle. [/ QUOTE ] baluga theorum yo
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
