Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Beginners Questions
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2007, 03:56 PM
PugsMcGee PugsMcGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 390
Default All-In Method

What pocket pairs should I be playing while using this method?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2007, 03:58 PM
jedi jedi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Selling cheezy poker gear.
Posts: 3,976
Default Re: All-In Method

[ QUOTE ]
What pocket pairs should I be playing while using this method?

[/ QUOTE ]

Need more information:

What game are you playing? Tournament or Cash game? What kind of stack sizes as related to the blinds do you have? How many players at the table? What has the action been before you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:01 PM
PugsMcGee PugsMcGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 390
Default Re: All-In Method

Cash game. NL Tex Holdem. I'm buying in for Min every time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:11 PM
No Fizzle No Fizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Staking Mickey Appleman
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: All-In Method

[ QUOTE ]
Cash game. NL Tex Holdem. I'm buying in for Min every time.

[/ QUOTE ]

So your plan in to buy in for the min, wait until you have a pocket pair, and then shove.

May I ask why?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:22 PM
PugsMcGee PugsMcGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Center of the Universe
Posts: 390
Default Re: All-In Method

No not pocket pair...basically top ten hands. It's a valid method that is not "cheap" or "crazy."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:24 PM
jasonfish11 jasonfish11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 542
Default Re: All-In Method

Top 10 is usuall
77+
AK
or AQ

I would not reraise all in with 77-99 or AQ using this method but open shoving them isnt aweful.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:55 PM
choccypie choccypie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 598
Default Re: All-In Method

[ QUOTE ]
No not pocket pair...basically top ten hands. It's a valid method that is not "cheap" or "crazy."

[/ QUOTE ]

Valid method? Really??

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2007, 05:23 PM
No Fizzle No Fizzle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Staking Mickey Appleman
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: All-In Method

[ QUOTE ]
No not pocket pair...basically top ten hands. It's a valid method that is not "cheap" or "crazy."

[/ QUOTE ]

No, it's not.

It's a method that requires no skill at all, will not produce consistent winning results (is -EV in the long run), and will annoy all of your tablemates to boot. It would also be boring as hell.

Why do you want to do this?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-21-2007, 06:06 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: All-In Method

[ QUOTE ]
What pocket pairs should I be playing while using this method?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did you get this? It sounds similar to the short-staking method Ed Miller talks about in Getting Started in Hold'em, but that involves much less pushing pre-flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.