|
|
#152
11-27-2007, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
Wonder how many of them are regs at the 16s now. [/ QUOTE ] My ROI is WELL over 13% (like more than double that) at the 16s and Im still plugging away there. I guess its kind of stupid, but I wanted to get one of those leaderboard stars on sharkscope. Ive also had pretty lousy results at the $27s, although I think a good amount of that could have been poor table selection (I played a giant set with a bunch of really nasty players, albatross77 and a couple others). 
|
|
#153
11-27-2007, 06:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wonder how many of them are regs at the 16s now. [/ QUOTE ] My ROI is WELL over 13% (like more than double that) at the 16s and Im still plugging away there. I guess its kind of stupid, but I wanted to get one of those leaderboard stars on sharkscope. Ive also had pretty lousy results at the $27s, although I think a good amount of that could have been poor table selection (I played a giant set with a bunch of really nasty players, albatross77 and a couple others). [/ QUOTE ] How big of a sample size do you have for the 16's? Over 26% ROI sounds ridiculous
|
|
#155
11-27-2007, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
Yea your sample size with a 26% ROI at the 16s is probably very small, the highest I see on the leaderboard at the 16s is leadbellydan who is running at a 20% clip over 1800 games.
I've recently moved to stars and am running at 18% at the 16s over about 250 games but I think 15% is probably more reasonable as far as what I can maintain 12 tabling. I really don't think 26% is sustainable at all.
|
|
#156
11-27-2007, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wonder how many of them are regs at the 16s now. [/ QUOTE ] My ROI is WELL over 13% (like more than double that) at the 16s and Im still plugging away there. I guess its kind of stupid, but I wanted to get one of those leaderboard stars on sharkscope. Ive also had pretty lousy results at the $27s, although I think a good amount of that could have been poor table selection (I played a giant set with a bunch of really nasty players, albatross77 and a couple others). [/ QUOTE ] How big of a sample size do you have for the 16's? Over 26% ROI sounds ridiculous [/ QUOTE ] I think, but im not sure that its 476? I cant seem to get starscope to work, so im reduced to going to sharkscope and just adding up all of my 9 table SNGs with buyin $10-$20. I think the ROI is actually just under 32% right now at this level.
|
|
#158
11-27-2007, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
It's impossible to be > 20% in the 16s imho
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
