what stakes for substantial winrate

[hockey1983]

what stakesa are you playing to win at a substantial winrate??

[fringsrache]

if i may add a question:
Are omaha-winrates usually higher or lower in comparison to NLH?

Or maybe its better to ask:
Is it possible to archieve higher winrate in omaha than in NLH?

[fringsrache]

my first 17k hands of omaha (only plo100) are about 7ptbb/100h

yeah... i know.... means less than nothing...

[citanul]

hockey,

your question doesn't make any sense. do you want to know what stakes people are playing, and how many tables, to make a certain $/hr? or what?

frings,

from what i understand omaha winrates are higher but the variance is higher.

[Slap My Jack]

[ QUOTE ]


from what i understand omaha winrates are higher but the variance is higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, number of tables you can play are lower, unless you're a supernit.

OP, your question is pretty silly. You need to beat a level to be able to obtain a winrate at it. You don't get an automatic 7ptbb/100 winrate at any set of stakes.

[hockey1983]

At what buy in are the games much more difficult. Is it possible to play plo200 1/2 and achieve a ptbb of over 6. Thanks

[jbird]

[ QUOTE ]
At what buy in are the games much more difficult. Is it possible to play plo200 1/2 and achieve a ptbb of over 6. Thanks

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. yes. it's possible to play plo1000 and do this too.

It sort of depends on if you are good or not.

[fringsrache]

id actually like to hear some real number!
no one wants to post some stats?

[CrushinFelt]

See my recent annoying posts in the low content thread