#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: linecheck 2/4nl deep with 2p
You just said he won't call much, so why bother betting our almost guaranteed best hand.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: linecheck 2/4nl deep with 2p
Are those advocating checking here also checking behind here with 99?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: linecheck 2/4nl deep with 2p
[ QUOTE ]
I like 315$ better. fold to shove [/ QUOTE ] sounds perfect to me |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: linecheck 2/4nl deep with 2p
I think I've reconsidered. People love to call, even when they know their beat.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: linecheck 2/4nl deep with 2p
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i mean is river bet a bluff? i just check behind. [/ QUOTE ] erm no? [/ QUOTE ] Ok. What worse hands can possibly call this riverbet after the board came out the way it did? Unless you have some psycho image I don't see him calling with worse, ever. [/ QUOTE ] Well, He just might have that image. 2 things. 1. easy river value bet 2. Your F-ed when he check raises. 3. Checking behind here on the river is bad his hand is so likely to be JJ-AA and he has a tough time laying down. I probaby bet smaller on the river when the FD hits. |
|
|