#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
Party Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker Hand History Converter BTN: $59.95 Hero (SB): $102 BB: $37.85 UTG: $98.50 MP: $187.80 CO: $113.78 Pre-Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB) UTG calls $1, 3 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $5</font>, BB folds, UTG calls $4 Flop: ($11) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets $8</font>, <font color="red">UTG raises to $16</font> Im very sure he has an unimproved small pocket pair here, because I dont think he would raised with a full house. Im I right? Should i fold, call or 3bet here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
most of the time I muck here
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
But if i think i would fold more than 50% of the times, shouldnt I put in a potsized 3bet here?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
I don't see how we can muck here getting better than 4:1. Readless I dont think we can push (he has to fold 50%+ of the time). But we should be able to call. Stop & go a lot of turns that appear to help our range/hurt his range. Check-raise a lot of turns that actually do help our range.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
check flop...then you can see free card on turn or find out where he is w/ check-raise
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
check flop with intention of raising or getting a free card. if it checks through, check/fold unimproved turn.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
[ QUOTE ]
check flop with intention of raising or getting a free card. if it checks through, check/fold unimproved turn. [/ QUOTE ] that's results-oriented thinking. cbetting this flop is std. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how we can muck here getting better than 4:1. [/ QUOTE ] Because we're OOP with A in a medium sized pot with about a 10% chance to improve on the turn and otherwise no idea where we stand in the hand. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't see how we can muck here getting better than 4:1. [/ QUOTE ] Because we're OOP with A in a medium sized pot with about a 10% chance to improve on the turn and otherwise no idea where we stand in the hand. [/ QUOTE ] meh. i think we know exactly where we stand in the hand, and we have a better than 10% chance to improve on the turn because we don't need an Ace or a King. A Queen and to a lesser degree a Jack will do nicely. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: AKs OOP against limp-call
Really? And whats villain holding?
|
|
|