#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)
MP3 ($59) CO ($60.55) Button ($87.05) SB ($25.85) Hero ($198.50) UTG ($102.55) UTG+1 ($105.20) MP1 ($14.25) MP2 ($138.25) Preflop: Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Button raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $13</font>, Button calls $9. I put my AJ solidly ahead of 1p0kerboy's stealing range, therefore I re-raise. I don't know what he calls the 3-bet with though. Flop: ($26.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, Button checks. I check planning to check-raise. If I lead out, I think he can raise me with 2 overs or a pocket pair and put me to a [censored] decision for a lot of chips. If I C/R, I can put him to a decision, and it's an easy fold if he re-raises my C/R. Turn: ($26.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $17</font>, Button calls $17. Well, his check behind makes a bet on the turn mandatory River: ($60.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, Button checks. I think I missed some value on the river, but then again, what hand that I beat would call here? Does he call with worse more often than he bluffs if checked to? Should I bet/fold to a raise? Final Pot: $60.50 I appreciate all comments. Results to follow. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
I think you can bet for value on the end. Hard to put him on a 5, hard to put him on QQ+ too, though these aren't impossible. I think he can call you with a lesser PP easily, TT, 99, 88, less likely the lower you get, but there are enough possibilities IMO.
Of course, if you have reason to believe he might try a bluff if checked to, then check calling could be better |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
I would check call river because I decent sized value bet would be pretty much pokerboy stack. A check on river may induce pokerboy to bet TT, 99, 88. I dont think he is not calling your value bet with TT, 99, 88, on the river. I would have played the hand different, I would have bet flop. As played with the flop check I think you want to bet alittle more on turn such as 21$
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
I think you can bet for value on the end. Hard to put him on a 5, hard to put him on QQ+ too, though these aren't impossible. I think he can call you with a lesser PP easily, TT, 99, 88, less likely the lower you get, but there are enough possibilities IMO. Of course, if you have reason to believe he might try a bluff if checked to, then check calling could be better [/ QUOTE ] agreed on the first bit ... but I value bet the river here 100% of the time (wow ... that's exploitable [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] ) If only because he has shown zero aggression in this hand. Maybe if he value bets/bluffs every river decision, then I may check back but would kick myself if he checked back His button range is huge ... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
Mingdu,
What hands do you expect to call if you value bet? You don't really beat anything that would call a bet. Are you betting thinking he has a pp and hoping that you have AK? Is he calling with TT or 99? It seems more likely that he would bet with 99 than to call with it. I personally would give him a chance to bluff at it and check/call but I'm open to other thoughts. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
If I C/R, I can put him to a decision, and it's an easy fold if he re-raises my C/R. [/ QUOTE ] why do you want to turn tptk into a bluff? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
it's an easy fold if he re-raises my C/R. [/ QUOTE ] c/r the flop then folding to the shove is absolutely terrible [ QUOTE ] I personally would give him a chance to bluff at it [/ QUOTE ] pokerboy isn't going to bluff here |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
[ QUOTE ]
It seems more likely that he would bet with 99 than to call with it. [/ QUOTE ] If you were in pokerboy's shoes would you bet with 99 here? I would be happy to check in down - get a cheapish showdown. I think we're letting him do just that - get to the cheap showdown that he wants. I think a value bet on river was best... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
Can't you find better spots to defend your blind and avoid this whole predicament?
You're building a big pot out of position against a tight player and you have no clue whether your hand is good or not. I think a fold preflop is an excellent play. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 bind defense vs 1p0kerboy. Am I weak-tight?
pokerboy, AJ beats your range in this hand, no?
|
|
|