Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:00 AM
Bulletproof Monk Bulletproof Monk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: THREE OH SIX AM
Posts: 3,893
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

meh i like it tbh
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:42 AM
ValarMorghulis ValarMorghulis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,071
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

65s is of course better to have here on the flop than 88 but 65s can shove over less flops so the preflop call with 65s is worse.

with 88, if call the threebet we have to make these kind of moves on decent to good flops. Of course a frequent 3bettor (who cbets a lot) folds more than a 1/3 of the time. OOP I would play this the same every time. IP, I don't mind calling and probably stacking off on turn.

Of course whenever I do this, they have AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:03 AM
atmstuck atmstuck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 56
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

Or KK...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:22 AM
Fonkey123 Fonkey123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: University Park
Posts: 4,428
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Who cares about his calling range when he's bluffing so often?

[/ QUOTE ]

you should care. it dramatically affects your overall equity.

This is why I think it's much better to do this with AJ (not that calling pf with AJ would be good, but you get the point) rather than 88.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saying what hands you'd rather have makes no difference. [censored] I'd rather have top set every hand. You look at this individual hand in a vacuum combined with reads. Shoving here is +EV, because he's bluffing so often. Of course when you get called you're crushed, but his calling range isn't important because shoving is +EV with 88.

We can discuss the merits of calling the flop having a higher expectation; however, pokerstoving his calling range is stupid because of course it has us crushed.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:01 AM
SinkRox SinkRox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 857
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

No-ones mentiond if its better or not to shove the flop if there's a FD out there.

Does everyone agree we have more FE when there's no FD on the flop?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:33 AM
McBeef McBeef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: RMIT/MELB/AUS
Posts: 218
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

i really like the fold % analysis barrin, very helpful
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:51 AM
martijn martijn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: punishing minraises
Posts: 533
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

this is good
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-12-2007, 11:13 AM
kaby kaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 535
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

[ QUOTE ]
You look at this individual hand in a vacuum combined with reads. Shoving here is +EV, because he's bluffing so often. Of course when you get called you're crushed, but his calling range isn't important because shoving is +EV with 88.


[/ QUOTE ]

We need him to fold 58% of the time to make shoving +ev with 88 (barrins calc was incorrect imho, and nobody corrected me so i guess i didn't make a mistake [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]) ... that's a lot and pretty close imho... with 65s we need him to fold 28% of the time which is a huge difference

if someone gives me a 3bet range i'll go ahead and count the combinatations to see weither shoving 88 is +ev or not

also i'm not so sure you can shove more flops with 88 (when you flop a set + as a complete bluff ... but you still need the same Qhigh/Jhigh/rag board) compared to 65s (two pair, combodraws, every flushdraw, every oesd, every gutshot+pair on like a Q/J high board)
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-12-2007, 09:33 PM
Barrin6 Barrin6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 100k hands 5ptbb+ nl1/2 b4 nl2/4
Posts: 3,732
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Who cares about his calling range when he's bluffing so often?

[/ QUOTE ]

you should care. it dramatically affects your overall equity.

This is why I think it's much better to do this with AJ (not that calling pf with AJ would be good, but you get the point) rather than 88.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saying what hands you'd rather have makes no difference. [censored] I'd rather have top set every hand. You look at this individual hand in a vacuum combined with reads. Shoving here is +EV, because he's bluffing so often. Of course when you get called you're crushed, but his calling range isn't important because shoving is +EV with 88.

We can discuss the merits of calling the flop having a higher expectation; however, pokerstoving his calling range is stupid because of course it has us crushed.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fonkey,
I can't believe you just said this. You know better than this.

And kaby,
Thanks for correcting my math.

edit:

Also to add results
<font color="white">
He fires flop, I flat called.

Turn came a 5.
He fires again like less than half potleaving $68 or so. I said [censored] it and shove. He calls and shows 77. And I hold.

</font>
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-12-2007, 09:44 PM
Xanta Xanta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Kingston, ON
Posts: 1,937
Default Re: Playing against a light 3 bettor

Fonkey I think that you're missing a big point about preferred bluffing hands. Basically we get to select a few select times to make this bluff before our dynamic changes and we get looked up too much to semibluff shove much here. If we get 2 or 3 free walks where he folds TT (which is usually what I find I can pull off versus a light 3bettor), we should make our moves when we have the best possible equity.

It's one of the few spots in cash where 'waiting for a better spot' kind of makes sense because instead of making a +$1 EV shove, you can make a much better one later on since he's gonna remain exploitable until you start playing back.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.