Lock of the millenium (Dallas -1 @ NYG)

[PropPlayer]

This is about as correct as correct lines get IMO.
Flip a coin.

[rush66]

Even if I did like Dallas. 1. We all know there isnt a lock. 2. NFL lines are the hardest to beat, so this makes no sense. 3. Ive seen 5-6 better plays in the last week. Thats if I liked dallas.

[Henry17]

This is a pass for me but if I was forced to bet on the game I'd take the Giants.

[Quagmyer]

i'm passing on it as well but if i had to pick id take dallas.

NYG have played some weak teams: jets, bills, miami, atl, SF, philly..
combined 12-37

they lost already against Dallas as well. With the other loss being green bay

[thing85]

[ QUOTE ]
OMG, WTF do those trends even mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT.

Oh also, I think it'd be great if you could mortgage your kids.

[Jazzy3113]

Last year I bet my whole sports roll on Indy -1 @ Dallas. Although watching the game, Indy was the better team and had some crucial calls go against them they still lost.

There is never such a thing as a lock, and I would rather bet the Detroit game than this one.

[psuasskicker]

[ QUOTE ]
OMG, WTF do those trends even mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

NYG are a lock obv.

- C -

[Shoe]

I understand there is no such thing as a lock, and I was using the term "lock" somewhat freely and sarcastically there. But by using the term "lock" I just mean it is about as sure as I can be about something without the game already being played. Dallas wins this game atleast 85% of the time, IMO.

[psuasskicker]

[ QUOTE ]
Dallas wins this game atleast 85% of the time, IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet you're right about that 59% of the time...

- C -

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.point-spreads.com/footbal...exander-2.html

[ QUOTE ]
"Some things to consider in this one is that the Giants are 17-37 ATS in weeks 10 through 13 since 1992 but 6-0 ATS in home games revenging a loss against opponent over the last 3 seasons."

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but what's their ATS record when their quarterback's last name has double Ns?