Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:18 PM
I rebluff you I rebluff you is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 104
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

lol
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:24 PM
Noam Chomsky Noam Chomsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

c/f the turn all day

also, I think of a 27/13 as a donk, not a lag.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:27 PM
2Paul2 2Paul2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,698
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Villain isnt bluffing a blank/K river for a nrly full stack 100% of the time.

Where not playing Durr at 25/50 an it wouldnt necessarily be a gd play anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

You really think villain is going to check behind with unpaired hands on the King river? I don't think villain bluffs a blank river here with good frequency, but he's bluffing a K here a lot. Even with 88 and 99.

[/ QUOTE ]

There's only 4 K's in the deck so that's not a huge concern and a relative unknown(laggish or not) is def checking 88/99 more than he's firing on a K river.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:31 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

ah crap, the numbers are wrong, meant to say he is 27/23/3. Even so I don't think he 3bets 88/99 types of hands here.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:36 PM
cheer cheer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: thinking everyone is bluffing
Posts: 1,064
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
ah crap, the numbers are wrong, meant to say he is 27/23/3. Even so I don't think he 3bets 88/99 types of hands here.

[/ QUOTE ]

4bet call push. imo
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:48 PM
billybeartku billybeartku is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 554
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

I'd 4bet pre to about 87-95 and jam it in on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:50 PM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

shove flop
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:52 PM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

Probably cf turn. I'd rather donk turn than cc though.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:56 PM
tubasteve tubasteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 3-bet
Posts: 7,271
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
shove flop

[/ QUOTE ]

that cant be optimal
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-04-2007, 01:56 PM
Tickner Tickner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,554
Default Re: JJ OOP vs a LAG

Jay, would you mind PMing me this HH? I see an error.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.