Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 09-22-2007, 06:30 PM
mythrilfox mythrilfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Big fold with top pair and nfd

jesus this thread gives me a headache. first of all, i think this is a clear open pf in most 5handed games, and probably semi-marginal in 6handed games (though in certain games i dont mind folding it) it's not a big deal either way, so let's stop talking about it.

second of all, primate, almost nothing you have said in this thread makes any sense.

"If we must play this on the flop then raise and commit to the hand."

uhh, we have over $170 left to play and incredible implied odds if someone else overcalls with a flush draw, or if the leader has a flush draw himself. I'm not saying raising is bad (though i think it is), i'm saying that this statement doesn't clarify anything.

as to why i think raising the flop is bad, he is only going to put more money in the pot here with 8h7h,7h5h,9hXh or a set. anything else is folding. we are 33% against this range, so the only way raising can be good is if he folds a significant portion of the time, which isnt clear at this point. i think these hands make up a massive portion of his range, so flop call seems pretty obvious.

"Your only a serious dog to a set."

only? that sounds pretty bad...

"Your raising UTG with this hand for exactly this scenario right?"

this scenario is one in 50 thousand, i wouldnt exactly call it a "dream scenario", and i wouldnt say how we play it affects our overall winrate that much either.

"That turn card is a bonus and sickener for the villain. It was one of your outs that you should have raised with on the flop."

it also limits his hand range significantly.


"You raised UTG so represent an UTG holding."
the problem is HE'S not representing a hand weaker than an utg holding, so representing an utg holding does us very little good.

op: this was well played. hard to get paid off on flush, and he prob has a set.
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 09-23-2007, 05:38 AM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: Big fold with top pair and nfd

[ QUOTE ]
someone check the numbers, but my basic feel is call. unlikely to have high reverse implied and we have a lot of outs yo

[/ QUOTE ]

Umm, no we don't. We either have 8 outs or we are ahead already like always.
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 09-23-2007, 07:40 AM
Mat Cauthon Mat Cauthon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 77
Default Re: Big fold with top pair and nfd

Jay, what do you think of my post? You're the one with the best read on villain.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 09-23-2007, 07:42 AM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: Big fold with top pair and nfd

[ QUOTE ]
Jay, what do you think of my post? You're the one with the best read on villain.

[/ QUOTE ]

Duno I'm hungover and all the numbers are hurting my head. I'll try and give it a better shot this evening.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.