Criss Angel: Mindfreak

[Misfire]

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone been to a live show, or seen this guy or ones likes him? Or am I not alone in saying this stuff is just stupid?

[/ QUOTE ]

He used to have a live show called Angeldust and another called Amystyka or something like that..

[Yeti]

he has a cirque show coming out next year, should be pretty cool

[Gus Spangles]

yeti,

the extreme magnitude of suckassness of criss angel offsets any badassness of cirque de soleil.

[Rootabager]

I dont know why so much hate. I always thought his show was fun to watch.

[amplify]

Magic is dumb. Criss Angel is a goth dork. He has a couple of good illusions, but he has 5 consultants working for him designing this stuff so they should be.

[-zero-]

Anybody know how the [censored] he does this? Also, lol @ "A lot of people would say glass is a solid, some say it's a liquid."

[kyleb]

[ QUOTE ]
Also, lol @ "A lot of people would say glass is a solid, some say it's a liquid."

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's accurate.

What's your problem?

[-zero-]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, lol @ "A lot of people would say glass is a solid, some say it's a liquid."

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's accurate.

What's your problem?

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh, a quick Wiki says that there actually is some ambiguity as it could be classed as a supercooled liquid.

Criss Angel = 1
Me = 0 ( [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

[bwana devil]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, lol @ "A lot of people would say glass is a solid, some say it's a liquid."

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's accurate.

What's your problem?

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh, a quick Wiki says that there actually is some ambiguity as it could be classed as a supercooled liquid.

Criss Angel = 1
Me = 0 ( [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img])

[/ QUOTE ]

if youve ever been in really old houses, the window panes are thicker at the bottom because the glass runs. just takes a hundred+ years to notice.

[-zero-]

"Glass is generally treated as an amorphous solid rather than a liquid, though different views can be justified since characterizing glass as either 'solid' or 'liquid' is not an entirely straightforward matter. However, the notion that glass flows to an appreciable extent over extended periods of time is not supported by empirical research or theoretical analysis." - wiki

You could be right, just pointing out that it's not proven.