ON TOPIC???: Potential PokerStars issue

[pineapple888]

Help a brutha out

LOL in advance at me, if I'm grasping at straws here.

[ThorKGB]

[ QUOTE ]
I am very very suspicious about conspiracy theories

[/ QUOTE ]

[FoldYourLife]

This is the kind of stuff I used to look at two years ago when I'd lose 8 SNGs in a row and think Party Poker was rigged.

[pineapple888]

[ QUOTE ]
This is the kind of stuff I used to look at two years ago when I'd lose 8 SNGs in a row and think Party Poker was rigged.

[/ QUOTE ]

8 in a row? No WAY! I've never run THAT bad. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[FoldYourLife]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is the kind of stuff I used to look at two years ago when I'd lose 8 SNGs in a row and think Party Poker was rigged.

[/ QUOTE ]

8 in a row? No WAY! I've never run THAT bad. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
I seriously thought online poker was rigged when I would lose that many in a row. I obviously didn't understand variance.

[futuredoc85]

that means they monitored like 45 minutes worth of hands

[pineapple888]

[ QUOTE ]
that means they monitored like 45 minutes worth of hands

[/ QUOTE ]

Irrelevant.

If the odds were eleventy-billion to one during those 45 minutes, I for one will be convinced.

So how would we go about disproving the assertion at hand?

[tshort]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
that means they monitored like 45 minutes worth of hands

[/ QUOTE ]

Irrelevant.

If the odds were eleventy-billion to one during those 45 minutes, I for one will be convinced.

So how would we go about disproving the assertion at hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

By pooling and analyzing hand histories.

[suzzer99]

Have everyone check all-ins in their PT db. See if they see the same anomolies.

[blackize]

Suzzer how the hell do you do that?