|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you rather: | |||
| Play in a serious game of dodgeball once every two months for the next 15 years. |
   
|
30 | 56.60% |
| Not. |
  
|
23 | 43.40% |
| Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#81
06-21-2007, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
The poo flinging peanut gallery is not scaring me away; so it may benefit you to realize what it is you're doing and cease to embarres yourselves.
The louder you yell while not entering into thoughtful debate, the clearer it becomes who is more comfortable with his ideas and who isn't. 
|
|
#82
06-21-2007, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
The louder you yell while not entering into thoughtful debate, the clearer it becomes who is more comfortable with his ideas and who isn't. [/ QUOTE ] Many posters attempted to enter into "thoughtful debate" with you earlier on in the thread, and you either ignored their points or dismissed them out of hand. No amount of evidence that contradicts your twisted worldview will ever satisfy you. (If anyone wants proof of this, check out this thread: "There's no sound so you can hardly make anything out from it. - Nielsio" You have displayed time and again that your only intention on here is to push your agenda and to get more hits to your anarchist website. You are wasting everyone's time by pretending to want to debate.
|
|
#83
06-21-2007, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The louder you yell while not entering into thoughtful debate, the clearer it becomes who is more comfortable with his ideas and who isn't. [/ QUOTE ] Many posters attempted to enter into "thoughtful debate" with you earlier on in the thread, and you either ignored their points or dismissed them out of hand. No amount of evidence that contradicts your twisted worldview will ever satisfy you. (If anyone wants proof of this, check out this thread: "There's no sound so you can hardly make anything out from it. - Nielsio" You have displayed time and again that your only intention on here is to push your agenda and to get more hits to your anarchist website. You are wasting everyone's time by pretending to want to debate. [/ QUOTE ] how can he have a thoughtful debate when everyone refuses to give him a sequential mechanism for the collapse?? duh!!
|
|
#84
06-21-2007, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The louder you yell while not entering into thoughtful debate, the clearer it becomes who is more comfortable with his ideas and who isn't. [/ QUOTE ] Many posters attempted to enter into "thoughtful debate" with you earlier on in the thread, and you either ignored their points or dismissed them out of hand. No amount of evidence that contradicts your twisted worldview will ever satisfy you. (If anyone wants proof of this, check out this thread: "There's no sound so you can hardly make anything out from it. - Nielsio" You have displayed time and again that your only intention on here is to push your agenda and to get more hits to your anarchist website. You are wasting everyone's time by pretending to want to debate. [/ QUOTE ] how can he have a thoughtful debate when everyone refuses to give him a sequential mechanism for the collapse?? duh!! [/ QUOTE ] Right. How silly of me.
|
|
#85
06-21-2007, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
Re: aluminum being silver:
Melting point of aluminum: 933 K Melting point of iron (steel is an iron alloy): 1811 K Steel glows red-orange because of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbody_radiation Just about anything, when you get it up to those temperatures, will start giving off radiation at the appropriate frequencies. The picture you had of molten aluminum is meaningless, as it could just be at a low enough temperature that nothing registers when casually observing it.
|
|
#86
06-21-2007, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
I don't get why people give such a [censored] about this. Does it really matter? Really?
People are going to believe whatever the hell they want when it comes to this.. whether you can prove 100% otherwise to them or not. Especially tin foil nut jobs, naturally.
|
|
#87
06-21-2007, 10:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why people give such a [censored] about this. Does it really matter? Really? [/ QUOTE ] People will read this stuff and then vote like idiots. That's one reason.
|
|
#88
06-22-2007, 09:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
Neilsio,
I am not sure what http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6D.pdf fails to explain. At which point, sequentially speaking, does this break down for you? It may be that you don't understand some of the technical jargon. If you can explain what you dont understand, or disagree with, then we can explain it to you. This gives an extremely detailed sequential analysis of the collapse.
|
|
#89
06-22-2007, 10:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site
[ QUOTE ]
Neilsio, I am not sure what http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6D.pdf fails to explain. At which point, sequentially speaking, does this break down for you? It may be that you don't understand some of the technical jargon. If you can explain what you dont understand, or disagree with, then we can explain it to you. This gives an extremely detailed sequential analysis of the collapse. [/ QUOTE ] No dude, a sequential MECHANISM. Not ANALYSIS. COME ON!
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
