|
|
#11
11-04-2007, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Top two against two check-raises.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Fine. [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't villain have a set here a lot? What else does he c/r, c/r with? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? There's 5 combos of a set, and a bunch of combos of Kx, QT, and to a lesser extent, Jx. Played fine if you shoved turn. [/ QUOTE ] OK, fair enough. I guess I just didn't think villain would go for two check-raises with a hand like Kx. 
|
|
#12
11-04-2007, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top two against two check-raises.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Fine. [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't villain have a set here a lot? What else does he c/r, c/r with? [/ QUOTE ] Are you serious? There's 5 combos of a set, and a bunch of combos of Kx, QT, and to a lesser extent, Jx. Played fine if you shoved turn. [/ QUOTE ] OK, fair enough. I guess I just didn't think villain would go for two check-raises with a hand like Kx. [/ QUOTE ] People are dumb.
|
|
#13
11-04-2007, 09:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top two against two check-raises.
he could definitely have slowplayed AA/AK for one,
ild stick it in here always, only 3hands beat you (doubt he would c/minraise the flop with something ridic like 66)
|
|
#14
11-05-2007, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top two against two check-raises.
I'm glad you guys like my line, because I lost to his set of twos. But I guess it's one of those hands that one got to lose.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
