|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I like flop and turn, I would be really tempted to shove over his turn c/r since it looks so fos and the board is so drawy. [/ QUOTE ] Not too FPSy for a SNG? [/ QUOTE ] It is, IMO. [/ QUOTE ] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
I like rex's line here. I am never opening this light early on, but maybe since it's a higher buyin sng where opponents are presumably more observant, you have to vary play and open lighter to get more action on other premium hands. If that's the reason for raising pre then I think it's ok. I think we just have to muck the turn.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
First of all, the stats really mean nothing over 10 hands. You can't rely on 10 hands of data at all unless he has VPIP 50+. I bet the flop. As played, his raise is definitely suspicious, but he could be doing this with a 5 or a 'monster' AK. I don't think this is the right time to get tricky.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
Preflop is standard here. There is nothing FPSY about the turn if you have the best hand a lot get it in. There are spots where people have TPTK and will have similar equity and people say shove, just because your hand doesn't fall in a specific value doesn't make it too fpsy.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
I thought QJ in the CO was a pretty standard fold in the 9mans with loose blinds? I also would bet the flop t175ish. As played I can't pull a pudge here, I'd fold.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
I wasn't that clear in my earlier post, a play being too FPSY isn't a good reason to not make it. If you were to argue that his turn range is beating you that is a good argument, but it being too fpsy is not a good reason.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $225: post flop part 2
[ QUOTE ]
I thought QJ in the CO was a pretty standard fold in the 9mans with loose blinds? I also would bet the flop t175ish. As played I can't pull a pudge here, I'd fold. [/ QUOTE ] i'd have to agree here. |
|
|