Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Rutgers 7-0
1 3 21.43%
2 0 0%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
5 3 21.43%
6 0 0%
7 0 0%
8 0 0%
9 0 0%
10 8 57.14%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2007, 01:25 PM
Hollywade Hollywade is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,328
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

I like Russian accents, but I don't like hole card camera nits.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2007, 02:04 PM
csquard csquard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 116
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

I covered the WSOP ME for Stars Blog as well as PokerWorks. Take this for what it's worth, a view over the last three days of the event, except for Khan (I didn't cover him much but watched him from early on). Also, this is based more on watching interactions with other players, friends, and family. The only players I had direct contact with were Yang (asked a few questions about his faith after he won), Khan (couple brief conversations), Rahme (one discussion plus questioned his posse), and Lam (was on him most of the FT, talked a good bit to him before he left for dinner break and before he started HU).

1. Kalmar I may have only spoken to him once, but he was definitely living the dream from the time he got down to the final hundred or so. He's a guy I assume you'd want to head to a pub with or to a EPL match with.
2. Yang My buddy John Armbrust (out in 18th with AK vs AQ to Lee Childs) told me I should get on him when they got down to fifty players or so (Beat for me...). I've read alot about phoniness of his words and antics in a variety of threads, but I would definitely disagree. I too am a Christian and asked him several questions about his faith after he won (some in the Media had already started ridiculing him during the FT). I do question some of his actions, make no mistake (prayer for a card seems fairly bizarre to me). Having said that, he seems like an extremely humble man who had a very tough life doing what he wanted to do and not making any money. With Chris Ferguson watching him, I was struck by how out of place he would be with FullTilt vs. Stars, but that's the way the cookie crumbles.
3. Hilm I have little to go on with this other than general persona around the table.
4. Khan I may get flamed a bit for this, but I think his antics had little to do with who he seemed to be away from the table. He was extremely generous in his support of other Stars players and qualifiers who were making it deep, and he was a real pleasure almost all of the time. He played extremely well for much of the tourney, which gets lost in all of his antics.
5. Watkinson Again, very little to go on here. Maybe that means he should be lower in likability, I don't know.
6. Lam I may have him too high or too low, I'm not sure. He definitely got schooled HU, he played extremely tight throughout the end game. In the heat of the last two days, he really seemed focused and reveled in all of it with his friends and family. I actually thought he had a great chance to make a run HU, but he was either so card dead or couldn't pull trigger to get in there with Yang. I used to buy into the whole I'm-here-to-win-not-to-move-up logic of MTT's. After this year's WSOP, I'm now more convinced that being a patient nit most of the time is a pathway to success unless you have the game of Strasser or Jacob. Yang obviously showed what you can do with a big dose of blind aggression in the face of tight play, and I'm sure last year's Gold FT hands were in the minds of some like Childs with his laydown. So I don't fault Lam with how he played except HU, when he should have changed gears.
7. Rahme He seemed nice enough, so maybe he should be higher. Maybe I was just depressed that someone who almost could be my grandfather got so deep and I was sitting there writing hands down in a notebook.
8. Kravchenko Little to go on here, although I thought he, Khan, and Yang would be the three to watch at the FT.
9. Childs Granted, his busting out my buddy didn't help much in my eyes, and I'm actually sure he's a nice guy. But somebody had to be last.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2007, 02:57 PM
petp_the_greek petp_the_greek is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 100
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

most - rahme. i like the old guys. they dont act like buffouns, and somebody whos been playing for so long deserves some final table glory. reminds me of the old italian guy from 1 or 2 years ago that put a beating on helmuth.

least - khan obviously, he could be a straightup guy outside the poker room, but who cares, the way he behaved shows some seriously lacking social skills....maybe he should get some real life friends and stop 45-tabling all day on stars.

2nd least - tuan lam; i like the canadians and all, but dude, if youre 41 years old, quit with the frosted spikey hair highlights and the white prada sunglasses...you seem like a jersey shore wannabe.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2007, 10:17 PM
PhlegmWad PhlegmWad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 28
Default 2008 Broadcast Announced - likeable/least

As a result of the feedback on this years final table, is there any truth to the rumor that next years PPV broadcast will feature Phil Gordon doing poker commentary, and Pat Robertson and Billy Graham doing commentary on the praying and various appeals to Jesus?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2007, 08:41 AM
dollybythehair dollybythehair is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

Didn't really dislike any of the final table players, and i did actually grow to like Hevad so far as to have his antics downloaded to my mobile (cell). But I did vote for Jerry Yang, don't dislike him really, but as most people are saying, his constant praying was tedious (But it bloody worked for him....where are those rosary beads, im due for a sit n' go in a bit!). It appears Jerry has had a harder life than most in the ESPN interview he did, and he promised to give 10% to charity so good luck to the bloke (oh, he already got that!)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2007, 10:51 AM
KSOT KSOT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Daniel Laruso\'s gonna fight??!
Posts: 4,944
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

[ QUOTE ]
i did actually grow to like Hevad so far as to have his antics downloaded to my mobile (cell).

[/ QUOTE ]

Somewhere out there, there is a support group for you.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2007, 10:58 AM
21times20 21times20 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 366
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

do people really not see that there is something inherently wrong and possibly even un-christian about praying to god to intervene and give you a holy advantage over your opponents at a poker table?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2007, 11:54 AM
wheelflush wheelflush is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 195
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

[ QUOTE ]
do people really not see that there is something inherently wrong and possibly even un-christian about praying to god to intervene and give you a holy advantage over your opponents at a poker table?

[/ QUOTE ]it's not necessarily UN-christian, but it's not standard either. yang and the railbird fiance were probably just caught up in the moment and didn't bother to think about how it appeared. we all like to think we'll be as cool as allen cunningham when the cameras start rolling. that's unrealistic.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-12-2007, 04:49 PM
KiwiMark KiwiMark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 60
Default Re: Poll: Most / Least like-able players at the WSOP FT

Personally I liked the guys that were mostly quiet and acted with dignity. I disliked Yang the most for his out-loud praying, and I didn't think much of Khan's antics (though it was not as bad on the final table as it was earlier in the tourney). Childs was around middle for me, he wasn't too annoying, but he could have just played the cards and let his father quietly watch. Childs also put 5.5M chips into the pot then folded to a worse hand - very hard to like his play there.

Mostly I disliked Yang's overly aggressive too-big bets, I found myself rooting for his opponents in every hand he was in. I was happy for everyone that got doubled up by him.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.