|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1 Robber from NYC Shooting Arrested--Shocker, he has a record
I told you already, feel free to ban me at any point. If that's what you do for freedom of speech, so be it. My question is simple and makes a legitimate point, if you choose not to answer by blasting me because you hate the fact that I criticize your policies, this is your issue, not mine. The question is very clear, why is it OK to conclusively state that someone is guilty of robbing XYZ club but not OK to state whether or not said person frequented XYZ club? Which forum rule is this violating?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1 Robber from NYC Shooting Arrested--Shocker, he has a record
I requested myself to be banned, sorry to those who like my posts, and those who don't, you have a reason to be happy now. Absolutely ridiculous that I get threatened to be run for asking a reasonable legal question. I suppose I should construct future inquiries with the provision that the responding party possess a functioning brain.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1 Robber from NYC Shooting Arrested--Shocker, he has a record
All - sorry for the distraction from this critical issue. Firestorm is gone, lets get back on track.
|
|
|