Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:21 PM
Esection Esection is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Penn
Posts: 677
Default Re: Analyzing a business, this looks sketchy

ahnuld -

i think this clause exists basically to allow icahn to operate more efficiently and not have to worry about all the red tape. being a majority shareholder carries with it a ton of regulations and reporting requirements that have to be followed, and im pretty sure this is just a blanket "my interests arent always aligned with you so im just telling you thus in case a situation arises where i feel its in my best interest to take advantage of it" statement

also, being that he owns a large stake in both these companies (or other similar ones), it is his best interest to see them BOTH succeed.

finally, i know you know what dcf analysis is, and that all things being equal (+ assuming he holds the same stake in each company and that the business are equally risky), increasing the transfer prices on the one side will show no net benefit for icahn because its offset on the other.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.