Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old 11-06-2007, 09:35 AM
jjshabado jjshabado is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,879
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
i didnt say i was playing 1/2 (in fact you can see a few posts up that im obv not), but someone beating any limit higher than 1/2 is obv going to be +EV there. also, waiting for some sort of reason why you're thoughts on poker deserve ANY consideration at all. i posted mine, you still havent said anything remotely correct in the entire thread outside of "jman shouldnt have mucked a winning hand."

just lol @ any of you who think you are watching a really tough table on this show. also how many of you have ever played w/ any of these people, or any big famous live tourney pro? i think its funny that everyone who has (including me) says most of them are trash and you guys (who have only seen them on TV lol) are giving authoritative assertions on the difference between these guys and people beating MSNL online (none of you can). So what is it you guys are basing your arguments on? b/c mine are based on being good at poker, having played online and live, and having played against live pros.

[/ QUOTE ]

translation:

[ QUOTE ]
MY DICK IS SO SO SO BIG!!!

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #272  
Old 11-07-2007, 03:50 PM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ROFL, shall we put this thread to rest now and look forward to the 500k table

with no Jman

and with no mucking of the winning hand by the real pro's

[/ QUOTE ]

fwiw there are 1/2 players online who would be +EV against this line-up

[/ QUOTE ]

Hah, I think this thread has now officially hit its ridiculousness limit. Actually, that probably happened a couple hundred posts ago.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sshhhh, Don't Tap the Glass!

let future think his 1/2 pals can beat people playing 300/600 and higher. after all thats why they are still playing 1/2 - because they can beat 300/600








oh wait [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you think Jamie Gold is a winner at $200nl online right now? He isn't, and he is playing better than both Eli and Sammy overall. I'm sure a solid tight winning 2p2 type SSNL player could be +EV in this lineup just by nitting it up and punishing the overly loose players when you pick up a hand. This tight solid player wouldn't be a big winner for sure, but I'm sure they'd be a winner, albeit a very marginal one if that.

In the lineup for the past few weeks, there have been very few great players, in fact the beginning of the show had several amateurs. It's not in insane thing at all to say a good but not remarkable online player would be +EV in these games. Anybody with good fundamentals can just nit it up and exploit guys like Sammy/Eli/Jamie who are playing practically any two half the time.

And it's not even like Farha is bad really, he just doesn't care about the money and it shows. He is a really easy target in this game and has played far from well overall, although I do think he can be tough/deadly if the stakes meant something to him.

The point is that you don't have to be one of the top players in the game to be +EV. Think of it like when somebody takes a shot when there is one or two bad players present. The rest of the table is full of good professional players that are substantially better than our hero taking a shot, yet one bad player makes the game very +EV. Contrary to popular belief, the HSP producers didn't try to assemble the best players in the game, they assembled the most popular players in the game with some amateurs and unknown internet pros scattered in the mix.
Reply With Quote
  #273  
Old 11-07-2007, 04:00 PM
Lagtastic Lagtastic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 67
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

@ futuredoc85 ----

you're a complete joke.
Reply With Quote
  #274  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:11 PM
KamiKatze KamiKatze is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Princeton-Plainsboro
Posts: 449
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

GET OUR BELOVED JMAN BACK INTO THE GAME!
Reply With Quote
  #275  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:30 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
@ futuredoc85 ----

you're a complete joke.

[/ QUOTE ]

no im a winning poker player, which is why none of you can wrap your [censored] fan boy heads around anything i say. its ok though, if you want to believe that the people you watch on TV are the best in the game because norman chad says so, have fun with that. ill be over here in reality.
Reply With Quote
  #276  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:38 PM
Diamond Lie Diamond Lie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Going on a feel
Posts: 1,720
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
@ futuredoc85 ----

you're a complete joke.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, too bad you probably don't even play poker

futuredoc would rape you heads up
Reply With Quote
  #277  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:57 PM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

lol, the fanboi futuredoc has his own homies now

I'm nearly going to say I've seen it all now.
Reply With Quote
  #278  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:20 PM
Micro Donk Micro Donk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,736
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
lol, the fanboi futuredoc has his own homies now

I'm nearly going to say I've seen it all now.

[/ QUOTE ]

not like futuredoc was an unknown prior to this topic.

but weve yet to see any proof that you, or desab for that matter, are winning players...
Reply With Quote
  #279  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:51 PM
Diamond Lie Diamond Lie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Going on a feel
Posts: 1,720
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

Dudes a solid player who has respect from a lot of people on the forums

If you can't respect someone who actually gives back to 2+2 and has a solid game its prob bc youre a troll or you're clueless (possibly both)?
Reply With Quote
  #280  
Old 11-07-2007, 08:58 PM
Jbrochu Jbrochu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,068
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
lol, the fanboi futuredoc has his own homies now

I'm nearly going to say I've seen it all now.

[/ QUOTE ]


futuredoc is the nutz.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.