#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
I make it $375 on the turn to represent a draw that is pricing itself in to call a shove.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
I make it $375 on the turn to represent a draw that is pricing itself in to call a shove. [/ QUOTE ] this works as well - the point being you want to rep a draw (by raising large) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
jesus stop going on about a 'turn shove' we have more options that min-raise or shove! i'd probably make a 2.5x or 3x raise. [/ QUOTE ] 1. stick up your ass? 2. i understand that but i dont think that those options are good... a raise somewhere in between looks so much stronger than either of the other two |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] jesus stop going on about a 'turn shove' we have more options that min-raise or shove! i'd probably make a 2.5x or 3x raise. [/ QUOTE ] 1. stick up your ass? 2. i understand that but i dont think that those options are good... a raise somewhere in between looks so much stronger than either of the other two [/ QUOTE ] i disagree, but if you really think htis way then shove. just don't minraise |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
I make it $375 on the turn to represent a draw that is pricing itself in to call a shove. [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I make it $375 on the turn to represent a draw that is pricing itself in to call a shove. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] i didnt think of this as a reason and i like it but i think i would be more inclined to shove a draw there but its a good idea |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
I liked the minraise
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
I make it $375 on the turn to represent a draw that is pricing itself in to call a shove. [/ QUOTE ] This is about right. Definitely not your garbage min-raise that ruins your river action. Especially if this guy does in fact call his stack off weak, a raise to about 400 reeks of a flopped draw that wants to show strength on the turn but get it in there regardless, hence the pricing in. If your read on villain is AKish, then I think that a big raise on the turn gets the money in there... definitely not the min-raise though... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
i also think making it $375 or so is a sweet line, mostly because this is a good size to raise to with air. if you have air, it's tough to get him off his hand with a minraise, and i think $375 has just about as much fold equity as shoving while saving a couple hundred bucks on the bluff.
with that said, clearly there's merit to shoving the turn, too (it probably reps a draw the best, and metagame-wise this is probably how you'd play something like 85ss if you didn't just call the turn with it). |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2,4 turned nuts against good reg, CAIDE
[ QUOTE ]
I liked the minraise [/ QUOTE ] I didn't |
|
|