#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 88 at best a 2-1 fav, worst 50/50. KJ at best 2-1 fav, worst 3-2 dog. A2s best 3-2 fav, worst 2-1 dog 75s best NO Favorite, worst 2-1 dog [/ QUOTE ] missing the point [/ QUOTE ] Dear Strong/Aggressive Villian: Please check flop-turn-river and ship me the Sklansky bucks. Thanxxxxxxx... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
[ QUOTE ]
why is the A2s more likely to flop a flush draw than 75s? typo? [/ QUOTE ] its the probability for flopping flush or flush draw but not str8 or str8 draw (to make the 3 categories disjoint) but as wrote i didnt make that myself, i am not completely sure about some details |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
OOP: KJ, A2s, 88, 75s.
IP: KJ, 88, A2s, 75s. In position, 88 gains a lot of strength because I can keep the pot small when it's correct to do so, and get really slim value at other times. The other hands obviously play way better in position, but not nearly to the extent that 88 does IMHO. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
KJ is definetly the best with 100bb.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
I think the other 3 should be behind the 88s just because 88 has so much more showdown value then any of the other hands and you are in position and are going to be checked to almost every time.
Im pretty surprised to hear arguments for other hands. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
There's a difference between asking "which of the four hands would you rather 3-bet" vs. "which of the four would you rather have in a 3-bet pot". Jman is asking the latter.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
being in pos i like 88 more than 57s now, although would be less inclined to 3bet it (not sure if that's what Jman is asking: i know he said which would you rather have but for me that seems like a pointless ? unless it's instructive about whether or not to 3bet).
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
[ QUOTE ]
being in pos i like 88 more than 57s now, although would be less inclined to 3bet it (not sure if that's what Jman is asking: i know he said which would you rather have but for me that seems like a pointless ? unless it's instructive about whether or not to 3bet). [/ QUOTE ] I was wondering how in the hell you had 88 behind but I pretty much agree with you the most... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
Phil, this question has a really solid answer, do you really expect people to give it away here?
Edit: omg people are giving legit answers, NL is over |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (Simple?) 3-bet Scenario
88, kj, 75, a2
|
|
|