Maybe I won't c-bet this time...

[Fadook]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
GRUNCH: I'm ok with giving up. The only good thing about that flop for you is that it's rainbow.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP. Monotone is the exact opposite.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] I don't type good

[Aaron W.]

[ QUOTE ]
My post was a little generic. I cb in spots like this when I'm up against unknowns who CC my preflop raise. The bet is for info and not for value. I realize that betting for info is frowned upon, but I can find out whether these players will fold to agression after the flop on a broadway board.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let me save you bets in the future. They will not fold a pair or straight draw, but they will fold undercards. This isn't a spot where you're getting any useful information. This sort of probing c-bet is better suited for 2 or fewer villains on a drawless flop. These are the situations where you find out if villains will peel with ace high, two overs, one over, no overs, or if they'll just fold.

[tailspin4540]

Looks like an easy check to me, especially on this board that no doubt hit at least one of our opponents.

[j4lvlie]

still got to cbet cbet everything in limit.

[BlueSmurf]

Hey all

I was an incompetent poker player before, and my break from the game has not made me better. I'm back and worse than ever. With that in mind I second the C/F line. If I were playing 1K/2K I'd try the C-bet, but at micro you're not getting 3 villains out here. The odds of hitting a seven are awful and it may not be enough anyway. In fact, if you regularly C-bet in these spots (as in "still got to cbet cbet everything in limit"), I think you're giving your opponents way too good odds to call your pre-flop shenanigans, because they can mentally add a small bet to the future pot from your 100% C-betting frequency.

Cheers,

Smurf

[bravos1]

[ QUOTE ]
still got to cbet cbet everything in limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

?? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] ??

[FUJItheFISH]

good check professor wong.