BB/100

[j4lvlie]

depends on tables.

[Choparno]

In all seriousness, I think consistently winning at 3 PTBB/100 over many hundreds of thousands of hands is a "good" win rate. Better than that is "very good".

Like someone else said, Seabeast is the only one who has posted proof of winning at 6-7 over a large sample. That obviously is outstanding. I see a lot of people say "if I dropped back to x tables tables at x stakes then this win rate SHOULD be sustainable", and no disrespect to those posters, but not many have posted proof of actually doing it over large samples.

[WizardAce]

i think there are a lot of interesting answers given.
BB/100 seems to decrease as more table you play, which means observing other players increases BB/100 but its obviously not so important at mid levels to make money in the long run. i cant imagine how a player can focus on each player , playing on 10 tables only looking at poker tracking software.

[HustlerLA]

[ QUOTE ]
i think there are a lot of interesting answers given.
BB/100 seems to decrease as more table you play, which means observing other players increases BB/100 but its obviously not so important at mid levels to make money in the long run. i cant imagine how a player can focus on each player , playing on 10 tables only looking at poker tracking software.

[/ QUOTE ]
I appreciate the honesty, because no matter how hard I work at multitabling I am not going to notice indivisuals tendencies when 6+tabling. I just assume most 6+ tablers go off standard reads and PT stats and images of regulars.