BCS Rankings.

ridonkulous · #1 10-15-2006, 04:49 PM

1. OSU
2. USC
3. Michigan
4. Auburn
5. West Virginia
6. Florida
7. Louisville
8. Notre Dame
9. Texas
10. Cal

xorbie · #2 10-15-2006, 04:50 PM

notre dame absurdly high.

pirateboy · #3 10-15-2006, 04:50 PM

Terrible. Teams overrated in preseason polls never get their ranking corrected, and BETTER teams rated lower in preseason polls have to work harder just to come close. Preseason polls are a joke, and thats why the BCS is a joke.

ridonkulous · #4 10-15-2006, 04:58 PM

Complete List, sorry it doesnt seem to fit well.

BCS Standings
Rk Team W-L Harris Coaches CPU % BCS
Rk Points % Rk Points % Prev Avg
1 Ohio State 7-0 1 2848 .000 1 1575 1.016 .000 4 .973
2 USC 6-0 2 2621 .000 2 1476 .952 .000 1 .956
3 Michigan 7-0 4 2557 .000 3 1430 .923 .000 20 .934
4 Auburn 6-1 10 1728 .000 7 1122 .724 .000 9 .748
5 West Virginia 6-0 5 2434 .000 4 1411 .910 .000 11 .745
6 Florida 6-1 3 2599 .000 10 1045 .674 .000 17 .738
7 Louisville 6-0 7 2181 .000 6 1205 .777 .000 19 .718
8 Notre Dame 5-1 9 1917 .000 8 1068 .689 .000 6 .694
9 Texas 6-1 6 2246 .000 5 1314 .848 .000 2 .684
10 California 6-1 11 1712 .000 11 981 .633 .000 0 .668
11 Tennessee 5-1 8 1959 .000 9 1060 .684 .000 0 .653
12 Clemson 6-1 12 1499 .000 12 896 .578 .000 0 .504
13 Arkansas 5-1 22 532 .000 18 532 .343 .000 0 .471
14 Oregon 5-1 20 822 .000 15 660 .426 .000 5 .449
15 Boise State 6-0 21 803 .000 17 575 .371 .000 0 .432
16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395
17 Nebraska 6-1 19 830 .000 16 596 .385 .000 0 .354
18 LSU 5-2 16 1035 .000 14 682 .440 .000 12 .350
19 Georgia Tech 5-1 15 1084 .000 13 703 .454 .000 24 .340
20 Boston College 5-1 25 204 .000 21 321 .207 .000 21 .259
21 Wisconsin 6-1 26 194 .000 22 288 .186 .000 18 .254
22 Oklahoma 4-2 23 430 .000 20 354 .228 .000 23 .158
23 Iowa 5-2 13 1244 .000 23 172 .111 .000 0 .070
24 Missouri 6-1 17 914 .000 27 89 .057 .000 0 .680
25 Tulsa 5-1 38 4 .000 - - .000 .000 0 .064

lastchance · #5 10-15-2006, 05:00 PM

Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

ridonkulous · #6 10-15-2006, 05:01 PM

What about Tennessee?

WLVRYN · #7 10-15-2006, 05:04 PM

Michigan was like 13-15 in preseason polls. I'd say that they have moved up well. I dont really care if we are 2 or 3. Doesnt make a difference as long as we beat OSU next month.

Except for ND probably being too high, I dont have too much problem with the rest of the rankings (though maybe Cal could be higher). The winner of WVa/Louisville will improve when they play each other (as well as Rutgers). SC's ranking will sort itself out when they play Cal and ND.

Dudd · #8 10-15-2006, 05:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though.

teamdonkey · #9 10-15-2006, 05:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Harris - 0.680
Coaches - 0.689
Computer - 0.730

it's those damned catholic computers!

ThaSaltCracka · #10 10-15-2006, 05:09 PM

after the top 3, who cares [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Well I guess, some irrelevant BCS bowl game bids, but still.