Romo or Bledsoe?

[Semtex]

Who should start for the 'boys?

[Suigin406]

i say bledsoe because it's too early in the season to give up on the playoffs and i think a veteran QB is better than a "young" QB ( Romo ~4 years, but barely any playing time )...i can't see how romo has a better chance to win than bledsoe...cowboys just need to better pass protect as bledsoe makes mistakes when he's under pressure...

[kyro]

I love Bledsoe for what he did for the Pats, but it's time he hangs it up.

[Kneel B4 Zod]

I think they're screwed either way

[SuperUberBob]

In the last 3 games Drew has started, he has a total of 2 TDs and 4 INTs, a 53.8% comp percentage and 502 yards passing. Furthermore, he the lowest QB efficiency rating of any current starting quarterback in the NFC this season.

Romo please...

[Bjorn]

Unless their o-line can improve all either can do is slow down the demise not stop it. That being said I prefer Romo.

Partly because a more mobile QB is a little bit more able to handle poor line play and partly to start rebuilding for next year.

/Bjorn

[AncientPC]

The season's over, I'd be happy if the Cowboys finished this season better than .500.

Start playing for next year, throw in Romo. Bledsoe's going to be a whiny pansy after being benched anyway.

[areinitz]

You have to stick with Bledsoe, he's a proven veteran. So what if he has gotten off to a rough start, the boys are still only 3-3 and I think they would have had a much better chance to beat the Giants if Bledsoe played the whole game. They have a very solid team, TO/Glenn, Witten, Jones/Barber, and plenty of playmakers on defense. They are only 1 game out of the division lead, you can't put in Romo now, maybe if they are like 3-7 in a month, but we know that won't happen. It would be a waste of a season to put in Romo now.

[PokerFink]

[ QUOTE ]
I think they're screwed either way

[/ QUOTE ]

[WayAbvPar]

I vote for whoever is more likely to hang TO out over the middle and get him half killed by a safety.