QQ facing agression...now what?

[Fat Nicky]

i actually don't just calling this turn. not like it commits us, if we call, eff stacks are $85 going into the river.

[Paul Thomson]

If people don't want to continue when the 3 falls on the turn, then I think we have to fold on the flop, unless we assume that the Villain is tricky enough to bet a dry flop which likely missed us which I wouldn't put against most Villains. So I guess if you assume he'll check-raise the flop as a bluff and shut down after that, then calling is ok...but I think u can usually fold the flop if ur going to fold the turn when a 3 comes.

[BingBangBoom]

[ QUOTE ]
If people don't want to continue when the 3 falls on the turn, then I think we have to fold on the flop, unless we assume that the Villain is tricky enough to bet a dry flop which likely missed us which I wouldn't put against most Villains. So I guess if you assume he'll check-raise the flop as a bluff and shut down after that, then calling is ok...but I think u can usually fold the flop if ur going to fold the turn when a 3 comes.

[/ QUOTE ]

So true...If only I could think so clearly in the heat of the moment.

[austriaco]

Nits like that always have the goods here. If you don't fold the flop (which would make an insane read) at least fold the turn.

[BingBangBoom]

Its easy just to say hes a nit fold, but correct me if im wrong but wouldnt nits have a lower agr factor then 3.5 and hes calling 15 percent of his hands wich is a range of: 77+,A7s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KTo+,QJo so does that change anything???

[cs3]

hes not calling with 15% of his hands. hes calling with pocket pairs and big suited broadways, mostly AXs

[Noam Chomsky]

I'm most likely calling him down here. That three just bought him my stack, on paper anyhow. One thing that helps a lot here though is to look at his c/r flop %. A lot of these nitty guys are c/ring an absurd % of flops to make up for all of the set mining they do.