Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 11-23-2007, 02:48 PM
DesertCat DesertCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pwned by A-Rod
Posts: 4,236
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
i've been saying it for weeks but usc is he best team in the nation. anyone still doubting?

[/ QUOTE ]

If they had been healthy it would not have been a question.
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:22 PM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

oh and OSU is going to get pwned. i'll take any wager if ohio state homers are interested
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:20 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i've been saying it for weeks but usc is he best team in the nation. anyone still doubting?

[/ QUOTE ]

If they had been healthy it would not have been a question.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. My thoughts exactly. Admittedly I havnen't watched too much college football this year, but I have watched every minute of every ASU game, including eight in person. ASU was bigger and stronger than every team they played, including Cal and Oregon. We had a problem with Oregon's speed, obviously, but would be able to wear them down some % of the games. Not only was USC faster than Oregon, they were bigger and stronger than ASU!!! I've never seen a defensive line wear down an offensive line, but that's exactly what happened last night. They put a beating on us. It's going to take some combination of injuries/USC not coming to play for anyone to beat the Trojans the rest of the way. Here's hoping ASU can take care of business against Nogales Tech next week and Oregon St or UCLA can knock off Oregon.

I feel sorry for the Buckeys. They think they've got a good team, but will problably lose by 30 in the Rose Bowl.
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:22 PM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

BTW, this is exactly why I don't like the idea of a playoff. A two loss USC team, including one at home to Stanford, would be a favorite going in.
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:43 PM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
BTW, this is exactly why I don't like the idea of a playoff. A two loss USC team, including one at home to Stanford, would be a favorite going in.

[/ QUOTE ]
why not? you think a team should be punished for losing when they had 5 starters out and their QB broke his thumb and threw 4 picks in the second half after throwing none?
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 11-23-2007, 04:49 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
i've been saying it for weeks but usc is he best two loss team in the nation. anyone still doubting?

[/ QUOTE ]

UGA (slightly)> USC. Would be an awesome game though.
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:03 PM
pokergrader pokergrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,792
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i've been saying it for weeks but usc is he best two loss team in the nation. anyone still doubting?

[/ QUOTE ]

UGA (slightly)> USC. Would be an awesome game though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cmon. USC is the best team in the country right now, and obviously the best 2 loss team. Its a shame it took Booty this long to become the QB everybody wanted him to be, because the last 2 games he has played wonderfully.
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:06 PM
Ditch Digger Ditch Digger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TBD
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, this is exactly why I don't like the idea of a playoff. A two loss USC team, including one at home to Stanford, would be a favorite going in.

[/ QUOTE ]
why not? you think a team should be punished for losing when they had 5 starters out and their QB broke his thumb and threw 4 picks in the second half after throwing none?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, every team deals with adversity. There really is no good excuse for losing to Stanford.
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:46 PM
Semtex Semtex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 1,539
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, this is exactly why I don't like the idea of a playoff. A two loss USC team, including one at home to Stanford, would be a favorite going in.

[/ QUOTE ]
why not? you think a team should be punished for losing when they had 5 starters out and their QB broke his thumb and threw 4 picks in the second half after throwing none?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, every team deals with adversity. There really is no good excuse for losing to Stanford.

[/ QUOTE ]
this is pretty lame IMO. sounds like you didn't watch the stanford game.
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 11-23-2007, 05:53 PM
jalapenoguy jalapenoguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 407
Default Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread

its stanfords only pac 10 win of the year. there is no excuse for the loss and its too bad that is the only thing keeping them out of the championship game right now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.