Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2007, 01:48 PM
whymelord whymelord is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 56
Default Collusion ruling

If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way?

TIA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2007, 01:52 PM
wstaffor wstaffor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 273
Default Re: Collusion ruling

They would probably get a penalty after the hand, but I don't know that a floor would kill their hand.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2007, 01:59 PM
AngusThermopyle AngusThermopyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Riding Binky toward Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 4,366
Default Re: Collusion ruling


No way are they going to kill anybody's hand.

You might get a TD to issue a penalty to Mr Loudmouth.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-30-2007, 02:02 PM
goldtoes goldtoes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,918
Default Re: Collusion ruling

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way?

TIA

[/ QUOTE ]

I've had this happen several times, and it really pissed me off. I did not bitch to the deal or the TD, but I told the guy to keep his mouth shut during the hand next time - and that it is considered collusion or cheating when you do it.

It's different when everyone kinda just knows to do it. I could care less then.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2007, 02:07 PM
PantsOnFire PantsOnFire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,409
Default Re: Collusion ruling

No, you can't kill a hand for this. What normally happens for each successive infraction is: warning, time penalty, disqualification.

There may be some casinos that assess disqualification before the hand is over which would mean a killed hand. Never seen that happen though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-30-2007, 02:17 PM
davidlong14 davidlong14 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 578
Default Re: Collusion ruling

Maybe a penalty after...not gonna kill their hands.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-30-2007, 03:39 PM
*TT* *TT* is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vehicle Chooser For Life!
Posts: 17,198
Default Re: Collusion ruling

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way?

TIA

[/ QUOTE ]


so you like to fight angles with angles? nice.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-30-2007, 04:00 PM
chillrob chillrob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 561
Default Re: Collusion ruling

I don't consider enforcing the rules to be an angle.
If the tourney has a rule about explicit "check it down" collusion, then I think suggesting it should not only get the cheater's hand killed, but get him removed from the tournament with no refund.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-30-2007, 04:02 PM
StrayBullet StrayBullet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 368
Default Re: Collusion ruling

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I'm short stacked in a tournament, go all-in, get multiple callers, then one of the callers mentions to another caller that they should all just check to knock me out. Would I be able to get a rulling that would nullify their hands in any way?

TIA

[/ QUOTE ]


so you like to fight angles with angles? nice.

[/ QUOTE ]

DO you EVER have a decent (notice I didn't say nice) answer for somone new?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-30-2007, 04:04 PM
RR RR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: on-line
Posts: 5,113
Default Re: Collusion ruling

[ QUOTE ]
I don't consider enforcing the rules to be an angle.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is typically what most angles consist of.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.