|
|
#31
11-30-2007, 01:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: presidential election
Bodog has RP at +250 to win the Dem nomination. LOL. Wish they offered a no like 5 Dimes does. The no line on RP there is -1700 which is good value as I see the fair line here at -10000 max. However, I don't think the ROI over the period of time it will take to settle warrants it. If it settled faster, it would also act as a nice hedge on my happiness and potentially on my bottom line as well.
|
|
#32
11-30-2007, 03:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: presidential election
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bottom line, do you guys think I am ready to elect a female President? I don't no matter how bad the Republican is. [/ QUOTE ] FYP, I'm guessing. [/ QUOTE ] Not one bit sir. I would gladly elect a woman or a black woman/man. It is what they believe in and what they stand for that will decide who I vote for. I don't agree with Hilary though on the majority of what she stands for. FYP you really don't know me so don't type that shiat. I plan to make a lot of money off this election and betting against Hilary because this COUNTRY isn't ready to elect a female President is why. Honestly I would rather elect a monkey than either choice we will probably be given by the Dems and Reps. And yes the monkey can be female or male, just as long as they can throw around shiat as good as the other politicians running can.
|
|
#33
11-30-2007, 03:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: presidential election
Fair enough.
It's just that in my experience the people who confidently assert that this country will never elect an X (where X = woman, black person, Mormon, etc.) tend to be projecting their own prejudices, or at least the prejudice of their region. I don't personally detect any reason the US wouldn't elect a woman. There have been women leaders in tons of countries, including countries that are more fundamentally conservative than the US. There is a very strong anti-Hillary bias out the imo, but I don't think it has much to do with her being female per se.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
