|
|
#31
08-10-2006, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
[ QUOTE ]
What time did you play the hand???? My hand took place at 9:14 PM PST. That is pretty sick.... I have no reason to lie here. I made a bad call on a very sneekly played A-A. The villan in my hand pushed with 10-9 on a previous hand to another player's K-K and hit runner-runner Q-J to make a straight. This hand is not about you. PP is rigged. I can't believe I'm back. Back to the hand: it sucks that we know villan's hand, but why would he bet that much on the river. I showed weakness on the turn (my intention) and given his holdings, that is pretty locked board. I let the clock down before calling, it just seems that given the board and his hand, he can't put me on much. Can anyone explain that push given the strength of his hand? [/ QUOTE ] OP said the hand took place precisely at 9.14PM PST, which is 12.14AM EST. J R DOT's hand took place at 22:40:34 ET, which is 10.40 PM EST. So within 1.5 hrs, PP has two exactly the same hands and the same people with the same stack sizes betting the same amount. If PP is not rigged, what is? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] OP please post the actual hand history, I want to contact PP support! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] 
|
|
#32
08-10-2006, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
Surely both posters are referring to the same hand and OP misread 77 for AA. I mean everyone has the same stack size to the exact cent.
|
|
#35
08-10-2006, 07:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL400: A-K tptk, check turn to induce bluff, then BAM
This is pretty wierd. OP post the original HH please.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
