|
|
|
|
#1
11-30-2007, 07:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: preflop implied odds quesssssstion
[ QUOTE ]
so he can have a wide range if he's donkish or he can have a wide range if he's great.. [/ QUOTE ] actually that is a fairly good way of describing it. 
|
|
#2
11-30-2007, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: preflop implied odds quesssssstion
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so he can have a wide range if he's donkish or he can have a wide range if he's great.. [/ QUOTE ] actually that is a fairly good way of describing it. [/ QUOTE ] My initial thoughts were (and of course I could be wrong, that's why I'm posting this Q) that not that many players are "great" enough to have a wide range here. Since he certainly didn't seem like a spewy donkey, I figured his range was pretty tight. Not to bug you about this Ansky, but which non-J-containing flops are you getting it in on? I called PF with the intentions of folding unless I flopped really good... it came T6Tr, he led for 2/3rd and I folded according to plan. However I think (and it sounds like) my "plan" was too conservative in defining what flops are "really good". That's why I'm hoping to reevaluate my thought process PF in determining how to approach various flops.
|
|
#3
11-30-2007, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: preflop implied odds quesssssstion
I would never fold the TT6 flop i mean at the very least AQ,AK make up a big part of his range if he is playing straightforwardly, if not which is more likely, he can have other broadways, suited connectors and a few smaller pairs at least.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
