#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
I don't know what "now one" means. So without being sure what the bet is I will pass.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
your baller card is under review, empire
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
[ QUOTE ]
your an idiot. [/ QUOTE ] yay! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
This was established on the first post.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
Got this beat?
-DeathDonkey |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
He says the Sunday million winner isn't even close, so I'm guessing at least 250K.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
Pfft I've seen another 2p2 who is practically a nobody online with $107,000 on a .5/1 table. There is probably at least 20 2p2ers who have 200k on party.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
Meh this is the best big stack pic I have on party poker on my computer. Those 20 2p2ers are dumb.
-DeathDonkey |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You Can\'t Cover
empire about a week or two ago was saying he had around 186k on party which is incredibly stupid
|
|
|