Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > High Stakes Limit

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #351  
Old 05-12-2005, 05:55 AM
NLSoldier NLSoldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,080
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
I have a question. How many other Party 30/60 players have stats of 3BB/100 or more over 100k hands? And what are their stats?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have the answer but I'm sure James or J V or a lot of other people do.
Reply With Quote
  #352  
Old 05-12-2005, 07:50 AM
Nikla Nikla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 389
Default Re: DERB

I really don't think this game is beatable for 3/100 longterm no matter what kind of stats you pull out. With the new influx of tables it's a completely different story. But the way these tables played out prior to that, I think 2/100'ish is where it maxes out.
Reply With Quote
  #353  
Old 05-12-2005, 10:05 AM
tpir tpir is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,337
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My W$WSF in the 30/60 is 44.7 with a W$SD just over 52, although I've been running well in that game myself. Your W$WSF should be pretty high in this game since so many pots are contested 2- and 3-handed.

[/ QUOTE ]

well now i see where i need to improve abit...maybe i'll move to the HUSH forum for a while...either that or stop being your slot machine.

44% is real good nate....im at 41.98.

-Barron

[/ QUOTE ]
Holy crap. Mine is only like 36% in the 15 game over 50K hands... I must be missing out on a ton of calldowns or something. Now I am freaked out.
Reply With Quote
  #354  
Old 05-12-2005, 10:12 AM
MrFeelNothin MrFeelNothin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rockies Fever
Posts: 2,052
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

My W$WSF in the 30/60 is 44.7 with a W$SD just over 52, although I've been running well in that game myself. Your W$WSF should be pretty high in this game since so many pots are contested 2- and 3-handed.

[/ QUOTE ]

well now i see where i need to improve abit...maybe i'll move to the HUSH forum for a while...either that or stop being your slot machine.

44% is real good nate....im at 41.98.

-Barron

[/ QUOTE ]
Holy crap. Mine is only like 36% in the 15 game over 50K hands... I must be missing out on a ton of calldowns or something. Now I am freaked out.

[/ QUOTE ]

no, just a different game. of course you are going to win more often when there are less people to the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #355  
Old 05-12-2005, 12:03 PM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
It's just statistically impossible to run THAT well over 150k hands if you're a bad player.

[/ QUOTE ]

Statistically improbable. There's no such thing as impossible in statistics.
Reply With Quote
  #356  
Old 05-12-2005, 01:01 PM
James282 James282 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,309
Default Re: James---

[ QUOTE ]
James,

You seem to have played alot of hands vs this guy, whats your won from/lost to stats against him. I haven't seen anybody ever discuss this stat before so maybe its meaningless, I'm just curious if this guy is taking money from the TAGs as well as donks or just the donks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Without digging up the database from my backup files, I can tell you that since I got this computer(we have played 3.5k hands or so) - He has won 97 pots from me and I have won 86 pots from him. Over this stretch I am up 3,565.
-James
Reply With Quote
  #357  
Old 05-12-2005, 01:19 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clark County
Posts: 6,340
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
is it me? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

are you asking if you are DERB? If so, PM me your party handle and I will tell you.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know?!?! PM it to me.
Reply With Quote
  #358  
Old 05-12-2005, 01:23 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Clark County
Posts: 6,340
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's just statistically impossible to run THAT well over 150k hands if you're a bad player.

[/ QUOTE ]

Statistically improbable. There's no such thing as impossible in statistics.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mean to quibble, but there is something called statistically impossible in statistics. I don't remember off hand where that line is drawn. However, you're not necessarily wrong, it's just a definitions thing.
Reply With Quote
  #359  
Old 05-12-2005, 02:00 PM
afk afk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: DERB

[ QUOTE ]
With the new influx of tables it's a completely different story.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sorry to hijack the thread (only briefly!), but when did Party add all these new 30/60 tables? Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #360  
Old 05-12-2005, 02:02 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default How do you get this?

[ QUOTE ]
I think you'll find that he extracts a lot postflop when he is ahead and looses if not minimum then far less when he is behind. Also look for his winrate when raising the turn! I'm pretty sure it'll be something like 70%.

[/ QUOTE ]

How can one get a winrate when raising the turn from PT? Is this fancy-schmancy add-on software/programming? Who can I nag to show me how to walk me through it/figure this out?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.