#351
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
I have a question. How many other Party 30/60 players have stats of 3BB/100 or more over 100k hands? And what are their stats? [/ QUOTE ] I don't have the answer but I'm sure James or J V or a lot of other people do. |
#352
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
I really don't think this game is beatable for 3/100 longterm no matter what kind of stats you pull out. With the new influx of tables it's a completely different story. But the way these tables played out prior to that, I think 2/100'ish is where it maxes out.
|
#353
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My W$WSF in the 30/60 is 44.7 with a W$SD just over 52, although I've been running well in that game myself. Your W$WSF should be pretty high in this game since so many pots are contested 2- and 3-handed. [/ QUOTE ] well now i see where i need to improve abit...maybe i'll move to the HUSH forum for a while...either that or stop being your slot machine. 44% is real good nate....im at 41.98. -Barron [/ QUOTE ] Holy crap. Mine is only like 36% in the 15 game over 50K hands... I must be missing out on a ton of calldowns or something. Now I am freaked out. |
#354
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My W$WSF in the 30/60 is 44.7 with a W$SD just over 52, although I've been running well in that game myself. Your W$WSF should be pretty high in this game since so many pots are contested 2- and 3-handed. [/ QUOTE ] well now i see where i need to improve abit...maybe i'll move to the HUSH forum for a while...either that or stop being your slot machine. 44% is real good nate....im at 41.98. -Barron [/ QUOTE ] Holy crap. Mine is only like 36% in the 15 game over 50K hands... I must be missing out on a ton of calldowns or something. Now I am freaked out. [/ QUOTE ] no, just a different game. of course you are going to win more often when there are less people to the flop. |
#355
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
It's just statistically impossible to run THAT well over 150k hands if you're a bad player. [/ QUOTE ] Statistically improbable. There's no such thing as impossible in statistics. |
#356
|
|||
|
|||
Re: James---
[ QUOTE ]
James, You seem to have played alot of hands vs this guy, whats your won from/lost to stats against him. I haven't seen anybody ever discuss this stat before so maybe its meaningless, I'm just curious if this guy is taking money from the TAGs as well as donks or just the donks. [/ QUOTE ] Without digging up the database from my backup files, I can tell you that since I got this computer(we have played 3.5k hands or so) - He has won 97 pots from me and I have won 86 pots from him. Over this stretch I am up 3,565. -James |
#357
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] is it me? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] are you asking if you are DERB? If so, PM me your party handle and I will tell you. [/ QUOTE ] You know?!?! PM it to me. |
#358
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's just statistically impossible to run THAT well over 150k hands if you're a bad player. [/ QUOTE ] Statistically improbable. There's no such thing as impossible in statistics. [/ QUOTE ] I don't mean to quibble, but there is something called statistically impossible in statistics. I don't remember off hand where that line is drawn. However, you're not necessarily wrong, it's just a definitions thing. |
#359
|
|||
|
|||
Re: DERB
[ QUOTE ]
With the new influx of tables it's a completely different story. [/ QUOTE ] I'm sorry to hijack the thread (only briefly!), but when did Party add all these new 30/60 tables? Thanks in advance. |
#360
|
|||
|
|||
How do you get this?
[ QUOTE ]
I think you'll find that he extracts a lot postflop when he is ahead and looses if not minimum then far less when he is behind. Also look for his winrate when raising the turn! I'm pretty sure it'll be something like 70%. [/ QUOTE ] How can one get a winrate when raising the turn from PT? Is this fancy-schmancy add-on software/programming? Who can I nag to show me how to walk me through it/figure this out? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|