|
|
|
|
#1
11-30-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird donk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] btw, nina the new poker bob? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think I get it, and I think it's a compliment. Pokerbob used to one of the most active 2+2ers when it came to posting hands just like you Nina. Also like you, Pokerbob's hands usually involved very close/debatable situations. IMO you and pokerbob are both outstanding hand posters. 
|
|
#2
11-30-2007, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weird donk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] btw, nina the new poker bob? [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think I get it, and I think it's a compliment. Pokerbob used to one of the most active 2+2ers when it came to posting hands just like you Nina. Also like you, Pokerbob's hands usually involved very close/debatable situations. IMO you and pokerbob are both outstanding hand posters. [/ QUOTE ] yeah
|
|
#3
11-30-2007, 10:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weird donk
sweetjazz,
i understand that you want to discount all the 5x and pp hands because you don't know his tendencies and that's fine. but then you should discount any hand with a 4 for the exact same reason: lots of players would c/r it on the river instead of betting out. i believe 5x and pp's should be discounted somewhat more than 4x (based on the river action) but not substantially so. meanwhile, there are very few 4x type hands in his range given the pf and flop action.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
