Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:56 AM
kerpowski kerpowski is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 84
Default Kurtosis risk

It seems to me that the standard poker bankroll requirement calcs run on the assumption that pot sizes are normally distributed. In NL games this is certainly not the case. As an example a set of high stakes shortstacking NL hands of mine (10k hands) has the following characteristics:

Mean: 1.5ptbb/100
SD: 22ptbb/100
Kurtosis: 160ptbb/100

The kurtosis value is off the charts compared to a normal distribution. To what degree would this impact bankroll requirement calculations and is there any RoR forumlas that take kurtosis into account?

Regards,

Kerpowski
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2007, 04:47 AM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,850
Default Re: Kurtosis risk

Wellll...

For a start, kurtosis is a dimensionless quantity. If you calculated something that came out with units of BB/100, then you probably have the wrong number.

Still, it is true that high kurtosis means a lot of observations very near and very far from the mean, and not very many numbers on the order of 1 standard deviation away from the mean. You DO expect poker results to be like that since you have a lot of breakeven (early fold) hands and a few big-loss and big-win hands.

There isn't a simple one-size-fits-all adjustment for you to make based on the kurtosis (and kurtosis takes a lot longer to converge to a stable value than means and standard deviations do.)

If you are paranoid and want a completely worst-case situation (which you can think of as kurtosis approaching infinity), for simple confindence intervals you can resort to using Chebyshev's theorem, which says that at least 1-(1/k)^2 of your observations are within k standard deviations of your mean -- that is, 75% within 2 SDs, ~89% within 3, ~95% within 4. But there won't be a tidy risk of ruin formula for you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:10 AM
curious123 curious123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: not impressed by your perforaments
Posts: 585
Default Re: Kurtosis risk

[ QUOTE ]
To what degree would this impact bankroll requirement calculations...?

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't seem to matter much. See MOP, p. 293.

Also, post more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:52 PM
Troll_Inc Troll_Inc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FGHIJKLM STUVWXYZ
Posts: 2,566
Default Re: Kurtosis risk

[ QUOTE ]

The kurtosis value is off the charts compared to a normal distribution. To what degree would this impact bankroll requirement calculations and is there any RoR forumlas that take kurtosis into account?


[/ QUOTE ]

No there aren't any RoR formulas that take kurtosis into account.

Current RoR formulas are a joke.

This section of MoP is a joke.

I think it's pretty clear that the "experts" that post on this Probability Forum and Chen/Ankenman (whoever wrote that section) do not really have a clue about Probability Theory.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.