21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?

[ffr]

I've been playing a while, but just started to look into my PT numbers. In most of my games, I am about a 5 BB/100 hand player so far, but I found it shocking that my results at one level were WAY different. At the 6 person $1/$2 NL level over 25K hands I'm showing a profit of 21.5 BB/100? Now I know 25K hands isn't a HUGE sample, but it's not a small sample either.

I'm not posting this to brag...really, I just want to know how crazy this is. What do these types of results mean over 25K hands? I know these results can't hold up over a larger sample of hands, but isn't 25K hands enough to start making some safe assumpions about future expectations? If so, what future expectations can safely be made?

Thanks in advance.

[DontRaiseMeBro]

superuser imo

[NeedATimeMachine]

[x] swongs

[thac]

For some reason I think you're posting this to brag.

[Speedlimits]

25k hands is not even close enough to a reasonable sample size to determine your "true winrate." That being said, winrate is an inherently flawed statistic.

[Bigka79]

[ QUOTE ]
I AM posting this to brag...really



[/ QUOTE ]

FYP if u weren't postin to brag it wouldnt be in this forum

[ahnuld]

beat: running at 21 pt/bb at 1/2 is the same as 4.2 pt/bb at 1knl which I sustain

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
beat: running at 21 pt/bb at 1/2 is the same as 4.2 pt/bb at 1knl which I sustain

[/ QUOTE ]

LA DEE DA MR 500/HR

[EC10]

[ QUOTE ]
beat: running at 21 pt/bb at 1/2 is the same as 4.2 pt/bb at 1knl which I sustain

[/ QUOTE ]
variance: party poker

[ffr]

Ok, can we just address the question of what this could mean for future expectations? There is no way to keep up this type of return.