Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:42 PM
Dale Dough Dale Dough is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,043
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
I think that when the wife sues the woman that her husband is [censored]-ing for damages related to emotional abandonment or whatever they call it, the wife is being unreasonable to the point that she deserves to be kicked in the face.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, WTF? Did anyone do this and win? Husband is one thing, but the girl? The husband might as well sue the wife for being a fat cow that doesn't bring him the happiness she promised.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:55 PM
tarheeljks tarheeljks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: stone that the builder refused
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

you are making this way too complicated. if you want to [censored] her, then [censored] her. if not go find a gf who you are comfortable [censored]
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:01 PM
otnemem otnemem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hobo Ken
Posts: 3,006
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
And the fact is, 2 people got prosecuted in 2007.....so it's somthing to think about. There's a BIG difference when people cheat with a single person or if neither cheater has kids....but when both cheaters are married and both have kids, there's a lot of harm done.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you please link to an article about this, because I'm googling it like crazy and coming up completely dry. Anyway, if someone was prosecuted in 2007, it's not some progressive measure against adultery. It's because neither Arizona nor Illinois has removed primitive adultery laws from their books. The reason people are rarely/never prosecuted under these laws are because they were written like a hundred years ago, and most people believe it shouldn't be a prosecutable offense.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:03 PM
SamIAm SamIAm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Merry Chhannukaahh
Posts: 6,273
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
No, but when I asked her about joining the mile high club, she gave me step by step instructions on the best way to not get caught.

[/ QUOTE ]
A better question is: What happens if you DO get caught? Do flight attendants really care? Is there a law about 1 person in the bathroom at a time? It's not indecent exposure if I'm not exposed, is it?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:04 PM
joes28 joes28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 566
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

sounds like your wife is addicted to the [censored]. should have [censored] her harder.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:07 PM
tuq tuq is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: god for Mike Haven
Posts: 13,313
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

My fat ass can barely fit into one of those tiny lavatories, much less get another person in there. If I did manage to squeeze a broad in there with me I'd probably suffocate well before I shot my load of steaming man-gravy up her pooper.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:13 PM
slim slim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,432
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
good job slim. Why do you need to wait to get a place of your own? Don't pander to Tuq and Bison. Just focus on nailing the flight attendant.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's just say I have a good reason not to poker her in a motel room.....
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:14 PM
slim slim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,432
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And the fact is, 2 people got prosecuted in 2007.....so it's somthing to think about. There's a BIG difference when people cheat with a single person or if neither cheater has kids....but when both cheaters are married and both have kids, there's a lot of harm done.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you please link to an article about this, because I'm googling it like crazy and coming up completely dry. Anyway, if someone was prosecuted in 2007, it's not some progressive measure against adultery. It's because neither Arizona nor Illinois has removed primitive adultery laws from their books. The reason people are rarely/never prosecuted under these laws are because they were written like a hundred years ago, and most people believe it shouldn't be a prosecutable offense.

[/ QUOTE ]

here
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:27 PM
otnemem otnemem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hobo Ken
Posts: 3,006
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And the fact is, 2 people got prosecuted in 2007.....so it's somthing to think about. There's a BIG difference when people cheat with a single person or if neither cheater has kids....but when both cheaters are married and both have kids, there's a lot of harm done.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you please link to an article about this, because I'm googling it like crazy and coming up completely dry. Anyway, if someone was prosecuted in 2007, it's not some progressive measure against adultery. It's because neither Arizona nor Illinois has removed primitive adultery laws from their books. The reason people are rarely/never prosecuted under these laws are because they were written like a hundred years ago, and most people believe it shouldn't be a prosecutable offense.

[/ QUOTE ]

here

[/ QUOTE ]
You already linked to that. That's not a story. That's just an off-hand mention.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-22-2007, 04:46 PM
niss niss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: yankee the wankee?
Posts: 4,489
Default Re: Update for Tuq and Bison

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good job slim. Why do you need to wait to get a place of your own? Don't pander to Tuq and Bison. Just focus on nailing the flight attendant.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's just say I have a good reason not to poker her in a motel room.....

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming it is what I think it is ... no, you don't.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.