Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #181  
Old 07-27-2007, 04:12 PM
king_of_drafts king_of_drafts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: studying
Posts: 2,661
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]
I call ratholers light because I love sucking out on them

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old 07-27-2007, 04:15 PM
jono jono is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 651
Default Re: playing against ratholers

Shortstacking is great - they all suck at poker. But the ratholing aspect of it makes them bitches that need to die.
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old 07-27-2007, 04:48 PM
luegofuego luegofuego is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: degen in the rye
Posts: 1,597
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
its not a campaign. i do think its in all of our best interests that people dont play like complete dogshit versus the shortstackers. shorties at my table means i have to alter my game plan and i really dont want to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]

i understand your thinking, and in a perfect world if all the big stacks listened to you it might help the situation, but in reality you're just doing yourself a disservice because not enough people will adjust to make shortstacking significantly less profitable, but some will stop playing as bad as they are and it will cost you some EV as well as the shortstacks.

[/ QUOTE ]

pete, are u saying u are making as much now as u did during ur pinkprincess days back when people did like 10 times as many retarded moves as they do today?
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:13 PM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]

pete, are u saying u are making as much now as u did during ur pinkprincess days back when people did like 10 times as many retarded moves as they do today?

[/ QUOTE ]

ive made more per hour shortstacking this year than last year playing less tables, but i'm playing 25/50 mostly and in the pinkprincess days it was 10/20.

but when i first started, before everyone started hopping the bandwagon, yes, it was much easier. in general the tags arent as retarded as they used to be. i think that's because they've now realized that there actually are winning shortstackers and there's no point in just giving money away. back then you could step into a game and just wait for hands and shove for value and make a pile of money. now, if you haven't done the math (and there's a LOT of math to do), you'll be a very marginal winner at best at 3/6+. you can't just wait for big hands. you have to consider your opponents' ranges and your fold equity and resteal a bunch and if you haven't done the calculations they'll just run you over. that's why the nitty/bad shortstacks like fatalerror who used to be "good" aren't really making any money anymore.

basically, if you're not already doing it, it's not worth the effort to learn to shortstack effectively anymore unless you really like doing boring math. it's better just to learn full stack, which is useful in the juicy live games as well, not to mention tournaments.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:16 PM
catcher193 catcher193 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: min-raising and donk-betting
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: playing against ratholers

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $20 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

UTG ($1970)
MP ($2526)
CO ($788.90)
<font color="#C00000">Hero ($4880.90)</font>
<font color="#C00000">SB ($370)</font>
BB ($2278)

Preflop: Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $80</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $140</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls $60.

Flop: ($300) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets $230 (All-In)</font>, Hero calls $230.

Turn: ($0) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

River: ($0) 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $760

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
SB has 7h 9d (high card, king).
Hero has Qd 5d (high card, king).
Outcome: Hero wins $760. </font>

further proof that not all shortstacks are good
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:25 PM
True True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Blog ---> ssplnlpoker
Posts: 7,867
Default Re: playing against ratholers

seems like nobody really has a clue here, probably why games are so good.

and lmao :

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: Hero is Button with Q, 5.
3 folds, Hero raises to $80, SB raises to $140, 1 fold, Hero calls $60.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
further proof that not all shortstacks are good

[/ QUOTE ]

seems like they have good game selection though
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:27 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: playing against ratholers

lapoker summed up my thoughts on this issue perfectly.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:28 PM
catcher193 catcher193 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: min-raising and donk-betting
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]
seems like nobody really has a clue here, probably why games are so good.

and lmao :

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: Hero is Button with Q, 5.
3 folds, Hero raises to $80, SB raises to $140, 1 fold, Hero calls $60.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
further proof that not all shortstacks are good

[/ QUOTE ]

seems like they have good game selection though

[/ QUOTE ]
comprehension ftw


oh, and yes
[ QUOTE ]
lapoker summed up my thoughts on this issue perfectly.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:35 PM
ImsaKidd ImsaKidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CHOO CHOO
Posts: 11,074
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]
i have not played with a shortstacker below 10/20 who had any idea what he was doing.


[/ QUOTE ]

This means IMSAKIDD = BAD PLAYER
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old 07-27-2007, 05:36 PM
True True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Blog ---> ssplnlpoker
Posts: 7,867
Default Re: playing against ratholers

[ QUOTE ]

comprehension ftw


[/ QUOTE ]

don't understand....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.