NCAAF Week 9

[humdinger]

[ QUOTE ]
This is one of those times where its really fun to be a 3rd party bystander observing an argument.

[/ QUOTE ]

How would you know? You aren't one, here.

[ QUOTE ]


Its blatantly obvious how wrong one person is yet they'll never admit it or realize it and just make completely irrational arguments to dig the hole deeper.

[/ QUOTE ]

You just want to pretend to be a bystander so that you don't have to come up with a successful percentage number. Seriously...think about it, how often would it have to be successful.

I never said Fulmer was right. I said that if it ices Succop more than about 5% of the time, he was right.

What do you think the breakeven point is?

hd

[FlyWf]

"
I never said Fulmer was right. I said that if it ices Succop more than about 5% of the time, he was right.
"

1. We do know that icing doesn't work, you're trying to insert a step.
2. If you don't think he was right your entire series of posts is pointless
3. Don't act like you derived the 5% by carefully evaluating the chances of a sack, you just made that [censored] up.


I'll play along, though, my answer is 8.3%. What now?

[humdinger]

[ QUOTE ]

1. We do know that icing doesn't work, you're trying to insert a step.



[/ QUOTE ]

We do? I didn't know that. Source?

[ QUOTE ]

2. If you don't think he was right your entire series of posts is pointless



[/ QUOTE ]

False. My series of posts was to think aloud.

[ QUOTE ]

3. Don't act like you derived the 5% by carefully evaluating the chances of a sack, you just made that [censored] up.


[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I knew sacks were unlikely, but like I said, the 5% was a guesstimate.

[ QUOTE ]

I'll play along, though, my answer is 8.3%. What now?

[/ QUOTE ]

Then there's no way that a play that is wrong by a percent or two is the worst coaching move in history, like many here make it out to be.

THAT is my point....it's close. It's not unbelievably horrid, it's not overtly obvious. It's close.

hd