Computer to play 2 Poker Pros for 50k

[Yeti]

i have a lava lamp that could beat phil laak at limit poker.

[samsdmf]

[ QUOTE ]
i have a lava lamp that could beat phil laak at limit poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only online, the proper players have such a hudge advantage over electronic lighting devices live

[Popinjay]

2k hands is good for the pros IMO since it gives the computers a lot less time to create an accurate model.

[Revitox]

Live bots usaully have big tells like blinking lamps when they are going to checkraise, and they often scream out DANGER DANGER when they are bluffing

[Ringo]

[ QUOTE ]
Live bots usaully have big tells like blinking lamps when they are going to checkraise, and they often scream out DANGER DANGER when they are bluffing

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL, very good.

[PeterPlan]

MasterLJ,
four 500 hand !duplicate! matches = 4000 hands. This may yield a statistically significant result.

Popinjay,
the program does no opponent modeling, it is designed to play in a gametheoretically optimal way.

[sleepi]

this is retarded cause one time heads up matches don't mean [censored]. they need to make this a [censored] series or something

[ocdscale]

[ QUOTE ]
Big difference if this is limit or NL...

Also, 2000 hands is laughable

[/ QUOTE ]

Though the hands are randomly generated, they will be mirror matches, which is why they are using two pros.

In hand #354, it might be AJo vs. 44 on a board of AJ4T9. One of the human players will have AJo playing against the program's 44 and the other human player will have 44 playing against the program's AJo.

[xxThe_Lebowskixx]

[ QUOTE ]
Live bots usaully have big tells like blinking lamps when they are going to checkraise, and they often scream out DANGER DANGER when they are bluffing

[/ QUOTE ]

wp

[mertzo]

phil laak any good?